当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cognit. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The Verifiability Approach: A Meta-Analysis
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition ( IF 2.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-19 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.09.001
Nicola Palena , Letizia Caso , Aldert Vrij , Galit Nahari

The Verifiability Approach (VA) is a verbal veracity tool that assumes that truth tellers provide more details that can be verified and obtain a higher ratio of such details (verifiable details/total details) than liars. A VA meta-analysis was conducted. Results showed that truth tellers reported more verifiable details than liars (k = 20, N = 1532, g = 0.42). The effect was moderated by the presence of the information protocol and by the nature of the statement (event-related or not). Truth tellers reported a higher ratio of verifiable details than liars (k = 18, N = 1359, g = 0.49). The effect was moderated by the medium through which the statement was provided. Unverifiable details did not discriminate truth tellers from liars (k = 15, N = 957, g = −0.25). In conclusion, results showed good potential for the use the VA, although replications and field studies are needed.



中文翻译:

可验证性方法:荟萃分析

可验证性方法(VA)是一种语言准确性工具,它假定真相讲述者提供了更多可以验证的细节,并且比说谎者获得更多此类细节(可验证细节/总细节)的比率。进行了VA荟萃分析。结果表明,真相讲述者报告的细节要多于说谎者(k = 20,N = 1532,g = 0.42)。信息协议的存在和语句的性质(无论是否与事件相关)都减轻了影响。真相实话者报告的可验证细节比例比撒谎者高(k = 18,N = 1359,g= 0.49)。通过提供陈述的媒介减轻了影响。无法验证的细节并未将真相讲述者与说谎者区分开(k = 15,N = 957,g = -0.25)。总之,尽管需要重复和现场研究,但结果表明使用VA的潜力很大。

更新日期:2020-11-19
down
wechat
bug