当前位置: X-MOL 学术Environ. Health Perspect. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Guidelines for Modeling and Reporting Health Effects of Climate Change Mitigation Actions
Environmental Health Perspectives ( IF 10.1 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-10 , DOI: 10.1289/ehp6745
Jeremy J Hess 1 , Nikhil Ranadive 2 , Chris Boyer 1 , Lukasz Aleksandrowicz 3 , Susan C Anenberg 4 , Kristin Aunan 5 , Kristine Belesova 6, 7 , Michelle L Bell 8 , Sam Bickersteth 9 , Kathryn Bowen 10 , Marci Burden 1 , Diarmid Campbell-Lendrum 11 , Elizabeth Carlton 12 , Guéladio Cissé 13, 14 , Francois Cohen 15 , Hancheng Dai 16, 17 , Alan David Dangour 7 , Purnamita Dasgupta 18 , Howard Frumkin 3 , Peng Gong 19 , Robert J Gould 20 , Andy Haines 7 , Simon Hales 21 , Ian Hamilton 22 , Tomoko Hasegawa 23 , Masahiro Hashizume 24, 25 , Yasushi Honda 26 , Daniel E Horton 27 , Alexandra Karambelas 28 , Ho Kim 29 , Satbyul Estella Kim 30 , Patrick L Kinney 31 , Inza Kone 32, 33 , Kim Knowlton 34 , Jos Lelieveld 35 , Vijay S Limaye 34 , Qiyong Liu 36 , Lina Madaniyazi 25, 37 , Micaela Elvira Martinez 38, 39 , Denise L Mauzerall 40 , James Milner 6 , Tara Neville 41 , Mark Nieuwenhuijsen 42, 43, 44 , Shonali Pachauri 45 , Frederica Perera 38 , Helen Pineo 46 , Justin V Remais 47 , Rebecca K Saari 48 , Jon Sampedro 49 , Pauline Scheelbeek 7, 50 , Joel Schwartz 51 , Drew Shindell 52 , Priya Shyamsundar 53 , Timothy J Taylor 54 , Cathryn Tonne 42, 43, 44 , Detlef Van Vuuren 55 , Can Wang 56 , Nicholas Watts 57 , J Jason West 58 , Paul Wilkinson 6 , Stephen A Wood 8, 59 , James Woodcock 60 , Alistair Woodward 61 , Yang Xie 62, 63 , Ying Zhang 64 , Kristie L Ebi 1
Affiliation  

Abstract

Background:

Modeling suggests that climate change mitigation actions can have substantial human health benefits that accrue quickly and locally. Documenting the benefits can help drive more ambitious and health-protective climate change mitigation actions; however, documenting the adverse health effects can help to avoid them. Estimating the health effects of mitigation (HEM) actions can help policy makers prioritize investments based not only on mitigation potential but also on expected health benefits. To date, however, the wide range of incompatible approaches taken to developing and reporting HEM estimates has limited their comparability and usefulness to policymakers.

Objective:

The objective of this effort was to generate guidance for modeling studies on scoping, estimating, and reporting population health effects from climate change mitigation actions.

Methods:

An expert panel of HEM researchers was recruited to participate in developing guidance for conducting HEM studies. The primary literature and a synthesis of HEM studies were provided to the panel. Panel members then participated in a modified Delphi exercise to identify areas of consensus regarding HEM estimation. Finally, the panel met to review and discuss consensus findings, resolve remaining differences, and generate guidance regarding conducting HEM studies.

Results:

The panel generated a checklist of recommendations regarding stakeholder engagement: HEM modeling, including model structure, scope and scale, demographics, time horizons, counterfactuals, health response functions, and metrics; parameterization and reporting; approaches to uncertainty and sensitivity analysis; accounting for policy uptake; and discounting.

Discussion:

This checklist provides guidance for conducting and reporting HEM estimates to make them more comparable and useful for policymakers. Harmonization of HEM estimates has the potential to lead to advances in and improved synthesis of policy-relevant research that can inform evidence-based decision making and practice. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6745



中文翻译:


气候变化减缓行动对健康影响的建模和报告指南


 抽象的

 背景:


模型表明,减缓气候变化的行动可以在当地迅速产生巨大的人类健康益处。记录这些好处可以帮助推动更加雄心勃勃和保护健康的气候变化缓解行动;然而,记录对健康的不利影响可以帮助避免它们。评估缓解(HEM)行动对健康的影响可以帮助政策制定者不仅根据缓解潜力,而且根据预期的健康效益来确定投资的优先顺序。然而,迄今为止,在制定和报告 HEM 估算时所采用的各种不兼容的方法限制了其对政策制定者的可比性和有用性。

 客观的:


这项工作的目标是为气候变化减缓行动对人口健康影响的范围界定、估计和报告建模研究提供指导。

 方法:


招募了一个由 HEM 研究人员组成的专家小组来参与制定 HEM 研究指南。向专家组提供了主要文献和 HEM 研究综述。然后,小组成员参加了修改后的德尔菲练习,以确定有关 HEM 估计的共识领域。最后,专家组召开会议,审查和讨论共识结果,解决剩余分歧,并制定有关开展 HEM 研究的指导。

 结果:


该小组生成了一份有关利益相关者参与的建议清单:HEM 建模,包括模型结构、范围和规模、人口统计、时间范围、反事实、健康响应函数和指标;参数化和报告;不确定性和敏感性分析方法;考虑政策的采纳情况;和折扣。

 讨论:


该清单为进行和报告 HEM 估算提供了指导,使其对政策制定者更具可比性和有用性。 HEM 估计的协调有可能促进政策相关研究的进步和综合改进,从而为基于证据的决策和实践提供信息。 https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP6745

更新日期:2020-11-12
down
wechat
bug