当前位置: X-MOL 学术Acta Geotech. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Liquefaction resistance from cyclic simple and triaxial shearing: a comparative study
Acta Geotechnica ( IF 5.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-11-07 , DOI: 10.1007/s11440-020-01104-6
Marwan Khashila , Mahmoud N. Hussien , Mourad Karray , Mohamed Chekired

While cyclic triaxial (CTX) tests are widely used in liquefaction studies due to their simplicity, direct simple shear (DSS) tests and their ilk (e.g., the combined triaxial simple shear, TxSS) are more representative of stress conditions produced during an earthquake. Therefore, the CTX results should be properly correlated to simulate field conditions. In the current study, a series of CTX testing results performed on reconstituted samples of Baie-Saint-Paul, Ottawa C-109, and Quebec CF6B sands are compared to the corresponding TxSS and DSS results under both stress- and strain-controlled conditions. The cyclic TxSS stress-controlled tests are numerically simulated by adopting a coupled energy-based pore water pressure model using the computer code, FLAC. The TxSS numerical results are successfully compared with those obtained experimentally from (1) alternative stress-controlled TxSS, (2) available liquefaction potential curves (CSR-Nliq) in the literature, and (3) stress-controlled DSS testing results. As anticipated, the outcomes of the cyclic stress-controlled CTX testing results in the form of liquefaction potential curves are usually higher than that of the TxSS testing results. In contrast, due to the difference in the applied (strain-controlled tests) and the induced (stress-controlled tests) strains, the liquefaction resistance curves of TxSS are higher than those of CTX under cyclic strain-controlled test.



中文翻译:

循环简单和三轴剪切的抗液化性能:比较研究

而环状三轴(CTX)测试被广泛用于液化的研究由于其简单,直接简单剪切(DSS)测试和之流(例如,组合的三轴简单剪切,T X SS)是更具有代表性的过程中产生的应力的条件地震。因此,应正确关联CTX结果以模拟现场条件。在当前的研究中,在压力和应变控制下,将对Baie-Saint-Paul,Ottawa C-109和Quebec CF6B砂的重构样品进行的一系列CTX测试结果与相应的T x SS和DSS结果进行了比较。条件。循环Ť X通过采用基于能量的耦合孔隙水压力模型,使用计算机代码FLAC对SS应力控制的测试进行了数值模拟。将T x SS数值结果与以下实验成功地进行了比较:(1)替代应力控制的T x SS;(2)文献中可用的液化电位曲线(CSR- N liq);以及(3)应力控制的DSS测试结果。如预期的那样,以液化电位曲线形式进行的循环应力控制CTX测试结果通常高于T xSS测试结果。相反,由于所施加的(应变控制测试)和诱导的(应力控制测试)应变不同,在循环应变控制测试下,T x SS的液化阻力曲线高于CTX。

更新日期:2020-11-09
down
wechat
bug