Abstract This study aimed to determine which personality dimension(s) as measured by the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire best explain a given coping strategy as measured by the COPE-48. Additionally, to clarify the location of these strategies in the broader framework of personality structure. Neuroticism-Anxiety contributed mostly to strategies focused on emotions, acceptance and denial, Activity to proactive and resolute strategies, and Sociability to obtaining emotional support and advice. Moreover, Impulsive Sensation-Seeking contributed to denial and substance use while Aggression-Hostility to focus on and venting of emotions, and inversely to restrain coping. Besides, we replicated the approach-avoidance axis and obtained an independent component grouping Religion and the inverse of Drugs, Humor and Impulsive Sensation-Seeking. Positioning coping strategies within the well-known, broader and multidimensional space of personality structure may help in a better understanding of its organization and a rethinking of its conceptualization including their underlying neurobiological basis, ultimate evolutionary nature and survival functions.

中文翻译：

---

应对策略在人格的替代五因素模型中的位置

摘要 本研究旨在确定由 Zuckerman-Kuhlman 人格问卷衡量的哪些人格维度最能解释由 COPE-48 衡量的给定应对策略。此外，澄清这些策略在更广泛的人格结构框架中的位置。神经质 - 焦虑主要促成专注于情绪、接受和拒绝的策略，积极主动和坚决的策略，以及获得情感支持和建议的社交能力。此外，冲动性感觉寻求有助于否认和物质使用，而侵略性-敌意有助于关注和发泄情绪，反之则抑制应对。此外，我们复制了接近-回避轴，并获得了一个独立的组件分组宗教和药物、幽默和冲动感觉寻求的倒数。