Abstract This paper investigates a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) of WEEE consisting of a manufacturer, a retailer and a third party recycler, where the manufacturer can remanufacture used WEEE products or the manufacturer also can authorize the retailer to remanufacture used WEEE products. Combining the remanufacturing mode and government fund policy, four dynamic game models are found to analyze the effect of government fund policy on decisions of CLSC. In addtion, this study investigate the effect of government fund policy on consumer, environment and society using numerical analysis. The results show that: Without government fund policy, the manufacturer remanufacturing mode is better for CLSC members. By contrast, under the government fund policy, the retailer remanufacturing mode is the best choice. When government fund policy parameters meet a certain range, it can increase supply chain members’ profits and promote the recycling and remanufacturing of used WEEE products. The changing trends of supply chain members, consumer surplus, environmental impact and social welfare are the same, only the change thresholds of government fund policy parameters are quite different. When the government sets appropriate fund policy parameters, government fund policy is benefit for supply chain members, consumer, environment and society.

中文翻译：

---

政府基金政策下WEEE闭环供应链的最优定价与再制造模式

摘要 本文研究了由制造商、零售商和第三方回收商组成的 WEEE 闭环供应链 (CLSC)，制造商可以再制造使用过的 WEEE 产品，或者制造商也可以授权零售商再制造使用过的 WEEE 产品。结合再制造模式和政府基金政策，建立了四种动态博弈模型来分析政府基金政策对CLSC决策的影响。此外，本研究使用数值分析研究了政府基金政策对消费者、环境和社会的影响。结果表明：在没有政府资金政策的情况下，CLSC成员的制造商​​再制造模式更好。相比之下，在政府资金政策下，零售商再制造模式是最佳选择。当政府资金政策参数满足一定范围时，可以增加供应链成员的利润，促进废旧WEEE产品的回收再制造。供应链成员、消费者剩余、环境影响和社会福利的变化趋势是相同的，只是政府基金政策参数的变化阈值差异较大。当政府设定适当的基金政策参数时，政府基金政策有利于供应链成员、消费者、环境和社会。只是政府基金政策参数的变化门槛差异较大。当政府设定适当的基金政策参数时，政府基金政策有利于供应链成员、消费者、环境和社会。只是政府基金政策参数的变化门槛差异较大。当政府设定适当的基金政策参数时，政府基金政策有利于供应链成员、消费者、环境和社会。