当前位置: X-MOL 学术CRISPR J. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society Report on Heritable Human Genome Editing
The CRISPR Journal ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-20 , DOI: 10.1089/crispr.2020.29106.man
Misha Angrist , Rodolphe Barrangou , Françoise Baylis , Carolyn Brokowski , Gaetan Burgio , Arthur Caplan , Carolyn Riley Chapman , George M. Church , Robert Cook-Deegan , Bryan Cwik , Jennifer A. Doudna , John H. Evans , Henry T. Greely , Laura Hercher , J. Benjamin Hurlbut , Richard O. Hynes , Tetsuya Ishii , Samira Kiani , LaTasha Hoskins Lee , Guillaume Levrier , David R. Liu , Jeantine E. Lunshof , Kerry Lynn Macintosh , Debra J.H. Mathews , Eric M. Meslin , Peter H.R. Mills , Lluis Montoliu , Kiran Musunuru , Dianne Nicol , Helen O'Neill , Renzong Qiu , Robert Ranisch , Jacob S. Sherkow , Sheetal Soni , Sharon Terry , Eric Topol , Robert Williamson , Feng Zhang , Kevin Davies

In September 2020, a detailed report on Heritable Human Genome Editing was published. The report offers a translational pathway for the limited approval of germline editing under limited circumstances and assuming various criteria have been met. In this perspective, some three dozen experts from the fields of genome editing, medicine, bioethics, law, and related fields offer their candid reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society report, highlighting areas of support, omissions, disagreements, and priorities moving forward.

中文翻译:

对国家科学院/皇家学会关于遗传人类基因组编辑报告的反应

2020年9月,发表了一份关于遗传人类基因组编辑的详细报告。该报告为在有限情况下有限批准种系编辑提供了一种转化途径,并假设已满足各种标准。从这个角度来看,来自基因组编辑、医学、生物伦理学、法律和相关领域的大约三打专家对国家科学院/皇家学会报告发表了坦率的反应,强调了支持、遗漏、分歧和优先事项的领域。 .
更新日期:2020-10-30
down
wechat
bug