Abstract

Objective

This secondary analysis study examined the effects of a 6-week theory-based planning and mHealth text message intervention targeting workplace sitting time on health-related quality of life and work performance in office workers.

Design

Office-working adults (M_age=45.18 ± 11.33 years) were randomised into either a planning + text message intervention (n = 29) or control (n = 31) condition.

Outcome Measures

Workplace sitting time, time spent in specific non-sedentary behaviours (e.g. standing), health-related outcomes (i.e. emotional well-being, energy/fatigue, perceived role limitations), and work performance were assessed at baseline and week 6.

Results

Significant group by time interaction effects, that favoured the intervention group, were found for perceived role limitations due to emotional health problems and emotional well-being. No significant interaction effects emerged for energy/fatigue, role limitations due to physical health problems or work performance. Significant correlations in the expected direction were found between sedentary/non-sedentary behaviours and health-related outcomes. No significant mediation effects were found to suggest the intervention affected health-related outcomes through reductions in sedentary behaviour.

Conclusion

Reducing workplace sitting improves emotional well-being and contributes to fewer perceived role limitations due to emotional health problems among office workers.

中文翻译：

---

一种联合健康行动过程方法和移动健康干预，以减少上班族成年人在工作场所的久坐时间：一项检查与健康相关的生活质量和工作绩效结果的二级分析

摘要

客观的

这项二级分析研究检查了为期 6 周的基于理论的规划和 mHealth 短信干预对办公室工作人员健康相关的生活质量和工作绩效的影响。

设计

办公室工作的成年人（M_年龄=45.18 ± 11.33 岁）被随机分为计划 + 短信干预（n  = 29）或控制（n  = 31）条件。

结果措施

在基线和第 6 周评估工作场所的坐着时间、特定非久坐行为（例如站立）所花费的时间、健康相关结果（即情绪健康、精力/疲劳、感知到的角色限制）和工作表现。

结果

发现有利于干预组的显着的按时间分组的交互效应由于情绪健康问题和情绪健康而导致感知到的角色限制。由于身体健康问题或工作表现导致的能量/疲劳、角色限制没有出现显着的交互作用。在久坐/非久坐行为与健康相关结果之间发现了在预期方向上的显着相关性。没有发现显着的中介效应表明干预通过减少久坐行为影响了健康相关结果。

结论

减少工作场所的坐姿可以改善情绪健康，并有助于减少办公室工作人员因情绪健康问题而感知到的角色限制。