当前位置: X-MOL 学术Scand. J. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
General vs health‐specific consideration of immediate and future consequences to explain eating and exercise behavior in a Norwegian student population: A randomized survey experiment
Scandinavian Journal of Psychology ( IF 1.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-17 , DOI: 10.1111/sjop.12688
Tatiana Pozolotina 1 , Svein O. Olsen 1
Affiliation  

Over several decades, the consideration of future consequences (CFC) construct has been used to explain and predict health behaviors. However, the reported associations between CFC and health behaviors are relatively weak, leading to the low explanatory power of the models. Recent research suggests that CFC can be a domain‐specific construct. In this study, we explored the psychometric properties of the Norwegian CFC‐general and CFC‐health questionnaires in terms of factor structure and discriminant and convergent validity and tested the association between the general and domain‐specific CFC and exercise and eating behaviors. In a randomized survey experiment, 1,001 university students were assigned to either a CFC‐general or a CFC‐health questionnaire. In the tested models, two dimensions of CFC, consideration of immediate consequences (CFC‐I) and consideration of future consequences (CFC‐F), were independent variables. The exercise and eating behaviors, measured both as self‐evaluated behaviors and self‐reported frequency measures, were dependent variables. The results showed that in both CFC‐general and CFC‐health, CFC‐I and CFC‐F are distinct dimensions that differentially explain variance in health behaviors. A domain‐specific CFC‐health explained a significantly higher amount of variance in self‐reported eating and exercising behaviors than a general CFC. Self‐evaluated health behaviors were better explained by CFC than self‐reported behavioral frequencies. Practical implications of the findings and avenues for future research are discussed.

中文翻译:

挪威学生群体饮食和运动行为的近期和未来后果的一般与健康考虑:一项随机调查实验

几十年来,对未来后果(CFC)结构的考虑已被用来解释和预测健康行为。但是,据报道,CFC与健康行为之间的关联性相对较弱,导致模型的解释力较低。最近的研究表明,CFC可以是特定于域的构造。在这项研究中,我们从因素结构以及判别和收敛效度的角度探讨了挪威CFC常规和CFC健康调查表的心理计量学特性,并测试了一般CFC和特定领域CFC与运动和饮食行为之间的关联。在一项随机调查实验中,向1,001名大学生分配了CFC普通问卷或CFC健康问卷。在测试的模型中,CFC的两个维度 考虑直接后果(CFC-I)和考虑未来后果(CFC-F)是独立变量。以自我评估的行为和自我报告的频率测量来衡量的运动和饮食行为是因变量。结果表明,在CFC总体健康和CFC健康中,CFC-1和CFC-F是不同的维度,可以不同地解释健康行为的差异。与一般的CFC相比,特定领域的CFC健康可以解释自我报告的饮食和锻炼行为方面的差异要大得多。与自我报告的行为频率相比,CFC可以更好地解释自我评估的健康行为。讨论了研究结果和途径对未来研究的实际意义。以自我评估的行为和自我报告的频率测量来衡量的运动和饮食行为是因变量。结果表明,在CFC总体健康和CFC健康中,CFC-1和CFC-F是不同的维度,可以不同地解释健康行为的差异。与一般的CFC相比,特定领域的CFC健康可以解释自我报告的饮食和锻炼行为方面的差异要大得多。与自我报告的行为频率相比,CFC可以更好地解释自我评估的健康行为。讨论了研究结果和途径对未来研究的实际意义。以自我评估的行为和自我报告的频率测量来衡量的运动和饮食行为是因变量。结果表明,在CFC总体健康和CFC健康中,CFC-1和CFC-F是不同的维度,可以不同地解释健康行为的差异。与一般的CFC相比,特定领域的CFC健康可以解释自我报告的饮食和锻炼行为方面的差异要大得多。与自我报告的行为频率相比,CFC可以更好地解释自我评估的健康行为。讨论了研究结果和途径对未来研究的实际意义。CFC-I和CFC-F是不同的维度,以不同的方式解释了健康行为的差异。与一般的CFC相比,特定领域的CFC健康可以解释自我报告的饮食和锻炼行为方面的差异要大得多。与自我报告的行为频率相比,CFC可以更好地解释自我评估的健康行为。讨论了研究结果和途径对未来研究的实际意义。CFC-I和CFC-F是不同的维度,以不同的方式解释了健康行为的差异。与一般的CFC相比,特定领域的CFC健康可以解释自我报告的饮食和锻炼行为方面的差异要大得多。与自我报告的行为频率相比,CFC可以更好地解释自我评估的健康行为。讨论了研究结果和途径对未来研究的实际意义。
更新日期:2020-10-17
down
wechat
bug