One of the most effective factors in the sustainability of national parks (NPs) is the identification and determination criteria and indicators of the evaluation of environmental, economic and social NPs. The purpose of this study is the identification, customization, weighting, prioritization of criteria and indicators of NPs evaluation for determination of potential of environmental, economic and social services of Kiasar National Park (KNP). In the study, we used the Delphi questionnaire to identify criteria and indicators of the evaluation of environmental, economic and social NPs and entropy method to calculate their weight. Also multicriteria decision making such as an order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and simple additive weighting (SAW) method were used for the prioritization of criteria and indicators for the evaluation of environmental, economic and social NPs. For this purpose, we evaluated the KNP in northern Iran. In this study, we identified eight criteria and 141 indicators including five environmental criteria with 91 indicators, economic criteria with 20 indicators, social criteria with 20 indicators and political criteria with 11 indicators. Finally, for customization of criteria and indicators, 42 indicators were rejected and eight criteria and 99 indicators including 66 environmental, seven economic, 15 social and 11 political indicators were accepted for NPs evaluation. The results showed that the most and least number of indicators was related to environmental and economic indicators, respectively. Also, the results of weighting criteria showed that protective and environmental functions’ criterion with weight (0.217) and conservation of biodiversity with weight (0.140) had the highest weight for the evaluation in environmental, economic and social services of NPs. Also the results of prioritization criteria with TOPSIS and SAW methods expressed that protective and environmental functions and conservation of biodiversity point of view environmental criteria had a higher priority than other criteria. The results indicate that Kiasar National Park has sufficient potential to provide environmental, economic and social services.

中文翻译：

---

国家公园环境、经济和社会服务评价

国家公园（NPs）可持续性的最有效因素之一是环境、经济和社会NPs评价的识别和确定标准和指标。本研究的目的是确定、定制、加权、确定 NP 评估标准和指标的优先级，以确定 Kiasar 国家公园 (KNP) 的环境、经济和社会服务潜力。在研究中，我们使用德尔福问卷来确定环境、经济和社会NPs的评价标准和指标，并使用熵法计算它们的权重。此外，还使用了多标准决策，例如通过与理想解决方案相似的顺序偏好 (TOPSIS) 和简单加法加权 (SAW) 方法来确定用于评估环境、经济和社会 NP 的标准和指标的优先级。为此，我们评估了伊朗北部的 KNP。本次研究确定了8个标准和141个指标，其中环境标准5个91个，经济标准20个，社会标准20个，政治标准11个。最后，对于标准和指标的定制，42个指标被拒绝，8个标准和99个指标被接受，其中包括66个环境指标、7个经济指标、15个社会指标和11个政治指标。结果表明，最多和最少的指标分别与环境和经济指标相关。此外，加权标准的结果表明，保护和环境功能的权重（0.217）和生物多样性保护的权重（0.140）在NPs的环境、经济和社会服务方面的评价权重最高。TOPSIS 和 SAW 方法的优先标准的结果也表明，从保护和环境功能以及生物多样性保护的角度来看，环境标准比其他标准具有更高的优先级。结果表明，Kiasar 国家公园有足够的潜力提供环境、经济和社会服务。加权标准的结果表明，保护和环境功能的权重（0.217）和生物多样性保护权重（0.140）的标准对NPs环境、经济和社会服务的评价权重最高。TOPSIS 和 SAW 方法的优先标准的结果也表明，从保护和环境功能以及生物多样性保护的角度来看，环境标准比其他标准具有更高的优先级。结果表明，Kiasar 国家公园有足够的潜力提供环境、经济和社会服务。加权标准的结果表明，保护和环境功能的权重（0.217）和生物多样性保护权重（0.140）的标准对NPs环境、经济和社会服务的评价权重最高。TOPSIS 和 SAW 方法的优先标准的结果也表明，从保护和环境功能以及生物多样性保护的角度来看，环境标准比其他标准具有更高的优先级。结果表明，Kiasar 国家公园有足够的潜力提供环境、经济和社会服务。NP 的经济和社会服务。TOPSIS 和 SAW 方法的优先标准的结果也表明，从保护和环境功能以及生物多样性保护的角度来看，环境标准比其他标准具有更高的优先级。结果表明，Kiasar 国家公园有足够的潜力提供环境、经济和社会服务。NP 的经济和社会服务。TOPSIS 和 SAW 方法的优先标准的结果也表明，从保护和环境功能以及生物多样性保护的角度来看，环境标准比其他标准具有更高的优先级。结果表明，Kiasar 国家公园有足够的潜力提供环境、经济和社会服务。