Critical and global evaluation of analytical methods should be one of the primary goals in analytical chemistry. A holistic approach, however, requires a look at the varied features: commonly discussed validation criteria, often underrated practical and economic aspects, and typically overlooked compliance with the principles of green analytical chemistry. Carrying out such an assessment in a critical and transparent way is extremely difficult without special tools. The purpose of this work is to discuss and compare the three different approaches that seem to be potential candidates: multi-criteria decision analysis methods (MCDA), HEXAGON, and RGB model. The basic principles of each methodology, individual possibilities offered, and the results of the assessment of selected model methods will be presented. Ultimately, the potential compatibility of assessing the same group of methods using different tools will be examined. This contribution can help to select optimal tool and conduct more thorough and insightful assessments.

对分析方法的关键和全面评估应该是分析化学的主要目标之一。但是，整体方法需要查看各种功能：通常讨论的验证标准，经常低估了实践和经济方面的内容，并且通常忽略了对绿色分析化学原理的遵守。没有特殊的工具，以严格和透明的方式进行这种评估非常困难。这项工作的目的是讨论和比较似乎是潜在候选人的三种不同方法：多标准决策分析方法（MCDA），HEXAGON和RGB模型。将介绍每种方法的基本原理，提供的个别可能性以及所选模型方法的评估结果。最终，将研究使用不同工具评估同一组方法的潜在兼容性。这种贡献可以帮助选择最佳工具，并进行更彻底和更深入的评估。