当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Build. Eng. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Performance Evaluation of Heavy Oil Fly Ash as a Retarder of Portland Cement Hydration
Journal of Building Engineering ( IF 6.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-12 , DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101881
Osama Massarweh , Mohammed Maslehuddin , Salah U. Al-Dulaijan , Mohammed Shameem

Retarding admixtures have the ability minimize the adverse effects of concreting under hot weather conditions. Liquid admixtures are generally used for this purpose. However, these have limited shelf-life and therefore there is a need to develop solid retarding admixtures. This paper reports results of a study conducted to assess the performance of solid retarders for retardation of cement. The examined materials included heavy oil fly ash (HOFA) (a byproduct of oil combustion) and chemical retarders (sodium gluconate, sucrose and zinc oxide). The ability of up to 3% HOFA, by weight of cement, to extend the setting time was compared with other chemical retarders. The performance of the selected retarders was evaluated by measuring heat evolution, workability/slump retention, drying shrinkage, and compressive strength. The experimental results indicated that HOFA, sodium gluconate, sucrose and zinc oxide can effectively extend the initial and final setting time of cement. Further, the calorimetric data demonstrated that cement hydration was temporary hindered by the addition of HOFA and the selected chemical retarders. The 28-day compressive strength of concrete with the selected retarders, including HOFA, was similar to that of OPC concrete, and it ranged from 48.4 to 52.6 MPa. However, the rate of early-age drying shrinkage strain increased due to the addition of the selected retarding agents which may necessitate precautionary measures. Finally, it can be concluded that the retarding efficiency of HOFA was generally comparable to that of the selected chemical admixtures.



中文翻译:

重油粉煤灰作为硅酸盐水泥水化缓凝剂的性能评价

缓凝剂具有最小化在炎热天气条件下凝结的不利影响的能力。液体混合物通常用于此目的。然而,这些具有有限的保存期限,因此需要开发固体阻滞混合物。本文报告了一项旨在评估固体缓凝剂对水泥缓凝性能的研究结果。检查的材料包括重油粉煤灰(HOFA)(燃油燃烧的副产品)和化学阻滞剂(葡萄糖酸钠,蔗糖和氧化锌)。与其他化学阻滞剂相比,按水泥重量计,高达3%的HOFA能够延长凝结时间的能力。通过测量热量散发,可加工性/坍落度保持率,干燥收缩率和抗压强度来评估所选缓凝剂的性能。实验结果表明,HOFA,葡萄糖酸钠,蔗糖和氧化锌可以有效地延长水泥的初始和最终凝固时间。此外,量热数据表明,通过加入HOFA和所选的化学阻滞剂可暂时阻止水泥的水合作用。选择了缓凝剂(包括HOFA)的混凝土的28天抗压强度与OPC混凝土相似,范围为48.4至52.6 MPa。但是,由于加入了选择的阻滞剂,早期干燥收缩应变率增加了,这可能需要采取预防措施。最后,可以得出结论,HOFA的阻滞效率通常与所选化学混合物的阻滞效率相当。蔗糖和氧化锌可以有效地延长水泥的初始和最终凝固时间。此外,量热数据表明,通过加入HOFA和所选的化学阻滞剂可暂时阻止水泥的水合作用。选择了缓凝剂(包括HOFA)的混凝土的28天抗压强度与OPC混凝土相似,范围为48.4至52.6 MPa。但是,由于加入了选择的阻滞剂,早期干燥收缩应变率增加了,这可能需要采取预防措施。最后,可以得出结论,HOFA的阻滞效率通常与所选化学混合物的阻滞效率相当。蔗糖和氧化锌可以有效地延长水泥的初始和最终凝固时间。此外,量热数据表明,通过加入HOFA和所选的化学阻滞剂可暂时阻止水泥的水合作用。选择了缓凝剂(包括HOFA)的混凝土的28天抗压强度与OPC混凝土相似,范围为48.4至52.6 MPa。但是,由于加入了选择的阻滞剂,早期干燥收缩应变率增加了,这可能需要采取预防措施。最后,可以得出结论,HOFA的阻滞效率通常与所选化学混合物的阻滞效率相当。量热数据表明,加入HOFA和所选的化学阻滞剂暂时阻碍了水泥的水合作用。选择了缓凝剂(包括HOFA)的混凝土的28天抗压强度与OPC混凝土相似,范围为48.4至52.6 MPa。但是,由于加入了选择的阻滞剂,早期干燥收缩应变率增加了,这可能需要采取预防措施。最后,可以得出结论,HOFA的阻滞效率通常与所选化学混合物的阻滞效率相当。量热数据表明,加入HOFA和所选的化学阻滞剂暂时阻碍了水泥的水合作用。选择了缓凝剂(包括HOFA)的混凝土的28天抗压强度与OPC混凝土相似,范围为48.4至52.6 MPa。但是,由于加入了选择的阻滞剂,早期干燥收缩应变率增加了,这可能需要采取预防措施。最后,可以得出结论,HOFA的阻滞效率通常与所选化学混合物的阻滞效率相当。由于选择了阻滞剂,早期干燥收缩应变率增加,这可能需要采取预防措施。最后,可以得出结论,HOFA的阻滞效率通常与所选化学混合物的阻滞效率相当。由于选择了阻滞剂,早期干燥收缩应变率增加,这可能需要采取预防措施。最后,可以得出结论,HOFA的阻滞效率通常与所选化学混合物的阻滞效率相当。

更新日期:2020-10-12
down
wechat
bug