当前位置: X-MOL 学术Royal Soc. Open Sci. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
No evidence of male-biased sexual selection in a snake with conventional Darwinian sex roles
Royal Society Open Science ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-07 , DOI: 10.1098/rsos.201261
Brenna A Levine 1, 2 , Gordon W Schuett 2, 3 , Rulon W Clark 2, 4 , Roger A Repp 5 , Hans-Werner Herrmann 2, 6 , Warren Booth 1, 2
Affiliation  

Decades of research on sexual selection have demonstrated that ‘conventional’ Darwinian sex roles are common in species with anisogamous gametes, with those species often exhibiting male-biased sexual selection. Yet, mating system characteristics such as long-term sperm storage and polyandry have the capacity to disrupt this pattern. Here, these ideas were explored by quantifying sexual selection metrics for the western diamond-backed rattlesnake (Crotalus atrox). A significant standardized sexual selection gradient was not found for males (βSS = 0.588, p = 0.199) or females (βSS = 0.151, p = 0.664), and opportunities for sexual selection (Is) and selection (I) did not differ between males (Is = 0.069, I = 0.360) and females (Is = 0.284, I = 0.424; both p > 0.05). Furthermore, the sexes did not differ in the maximum intensity of precopulatory sexual selection (males: s′max = 0.155, females: s′max = 0.080; p > 0.05). Finally, there was no evidence that male snout–vent length, a trait associated with mating advantage, is a target of sexual selection (p > 0.05). These results suggest a lack of male-biased sexual selection in this population. Mating system characteristics that could erode male-biased sexual selection, despite the presence of conventional Darwinian sex roles, are discussed.



中文翻译:


没有证据表明具有传统达尔文性别角色的蛇存在雄性偏见的性选择



数十年的性选择研究表明,“传统”达尔文性别角色在异配配子的物种中很常见,这些物种经常表现出偏向雄性的性选择。然而,交配系统的特征,如长期精子储存和一妻多夫制,有能力破坏这种模式。在这里,通过量化西方菱背响尾蛇( Crotalus atrox )的性选择指标来探索这些想法。男性( β SS = 0.588, p = 0.199)或女性( β SS = 0.151, p = 0.664)没有发现显着的标准化性选择梯度,性选择( I s )和选择( I )的机会也没有发现。男性( I s = 0.069, I = 0.360)和女性( I s = 0.284, I = 0.424;均p > 0.05)之间存在差异。此外,性别在交配前性选择的最大强度上没有差异(男性: s′ max = 0.155,女性: s′ max = 0.080; p > 0.05)。最后,没有证据表明雄性口鼻部长度(一种与交配优势相关的特征)是性选择的目标( p > 0.05)。这些结果表明该人群中缺乏男性偏见的性选择。尽管存在传统的达尔文性别角色,但讨论了可能削弱男性偏见性选择的交配系统特征。

更新日期:2020-10-07
down
wechat
bug