Risk assessment instruments for violence and reoffending are widely used throughout the world. According to researchers, there are many different reasons to use these instruments; for instance, they are thought to reduce violence, save money, and improve treatment planning. In this article, we create a taxonomy to classify these risk management outcomes into agency, professional practice, and evaluee domains. Through a review of research, we show that instruments do not always achieve their goals. First, agencies encounter problems in successfully implementing instruments. Second, a lack of follow through can occur between risk assessments and the subsequent phases of risk management, such as case planning and intervention delivery. By drawing from the field of implementation science, we create an agenda for research.

中文翻译：

---

暴力和再犯罪的风险评估：实施和对风险管理的影响

暴力和再犯罪的风险评估工具在全世界广泛使用。据研究人员称，使用这些仪器有很多不同的原因；例如，它们被认为可以减少暴力、节省资金和改进治疗计划。在本文中，我们创建了一个分类法，将这些风险管理结果分类为代理、专业实践和评估领域。通过对研究的回顾，我们表明仪器并不总能实现其目标。首先，机构在成功实施文书方面遇到问题。其次，在风险评估和风险管理的后续阶段（例如案例规划和干预实施）之间可能会缺乏跟进。通过借鉴实施科学领域，我们制定了研究议程。