当前位置: X-MOL 学术Neuropsychol. Rehabilit. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
A pilot feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial of goal setting using the values in action inventory of strengths following brain injury
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-02 , DOI: 10.1080/09602011.2020.1823428
Jessica Wainman-Lefley 1 , Nicola Goudie 2 , Meghann Richardson 2 , Jonathan Evans 1
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT

In a single-blind feasibility pilot randomized controlled trial design, brain injury (BI) participants were recruited from a community rehabilitation centre and randomized into goal-setting using the Values in Action Inventory of Strengths (VIA-IS), and goal-setting as usual. Outcomes included the feasibility and acceptability of the VIA-IS, and its use in setting goals in a BI rehabilitation context, and whether it affected types of goals set (International Classification of Functioning (ICF)). Memory for goals two weeks later was measured, and a sample size calculated for a full-scale trial. Twenty-six BI participants were recruited, and randomized to the VIA-IS (n = 13) and control group (n = 13). Two dropped out of the VIA-IS condition, leaving a total n = 24. The majority (92%) of participants rated the VIA-IS as acceptable; both groups described the goal-setting process as “easy”. VIA-IS feedback varied; over two thirds (73%) of VIA-IS participants used their VIA-IS results to set goals and described it as “helpful”. There were no major differences in ICF categories between groups. A sample size of 66 would be required for a full-scale trial. A full-scale trial with multi-centre design appears warranted though might be more clinically beneficial for difficult to engage BI clients.



中文翻译:

使用脑损伤后力量行动清单值的目标设定随机对照试验的初步可行性研究

摘要

在一项单盲可行性试点随机对照试验设计中,脑损伤 (BI) 参与者是从社区康复中心招募的,并使用力量价值行动清单 (VIA-IS) 随机进入目标设定,目标设定为通常。结果包括 VIA-IS 的可行性和可接受性,以及它在 BI 康复环境中设定目标的用途,以及它是否影响设定的目标类型(国际功能分类 (ICF))。两周后测量目标的记忆力,并为全面试验计算样本量。招募了 26 名 BI 参与者,并随机分配到 VIA-IS(n  = 13)和对照组(n  = 13)。两个退出 VIA-IS 条件,总共留下n = 24. 大多数 (92%) 的参与者认为 VIA-IS 是可以接受的;两组都将目标设定过程描述为“容易”。VIA-IS 反馈多种多样;超过三分之二 (73%) 的 VIA-IS 参与者使用他们的 VIA-IS 结果来设定目标,并将其描述为“有帮助”。各组之间的 ICF 类别没有重大差异。全面试验需要 66 个样本量。一项多中心设计的全面试验似乎是有必要的,但对于难以参与的 BI 客户可能在临床上更有益。

更新日期:2020-10-02
down
wechat
bug