Introduction

Road traffic injuries remain the leading cause of death for youth ages 15 to 29. Poor hazard perception skills are a contributor to collision risk in this population. This Delphi study sought stakeholder consensus on the characteristics that should be prioritized in the development of technology-based hazard perception interventions for young drivers.

Methods

A three-round Delphi technique was used to reach consensus among eighteen experts in the fields of driver education and road safety. Three rounds of successive questionnaires were distributed, progressively integrating feedback and prioritizing intervention characteristics. Consensus was measured via interquartile ranking, interquartile ranking deviation, and percentage frequencies.

Results

In round 1, participants achieved consensus on all but two of the proposed 18 characteristics. In round 2, all statements but one reached consensus. In round 3, participants ranked the characteristics in order of priority, achieving consensus on what and to what extent should specific aspects of a technology-based intervention be attended to, in design and implementation.

Conclusions

This study provides a guideline for the development, evaluation, and implementation of interventions to address hazard perceptions skills in young drivers. As such, our findings contribute to the development of suitable and acceptable interventions among youth, aiming to curtail this public health emergency.

中文翻译：

---

基于技术的年轻驾驶员危险感知干预措施的特征：Delphi研究

介绍

道路交通伤害仍然是15至29岁青年的主要死亡原因。不良的危险感知能力是该人群撞车危险的原因。这项Delphi研究寻求利益相关者达成共识，即在开发针对年轻驾驶员的基于技术的危害感知干预措施时应优先考虑的特征。

方法

在驾驶员教育和道路安全领域，十八轮专家使用了三轮Delphi技术达成共识。分发了三轮连续的问卷，逐步整合反馈并确定干预特征的优先级。通过四分位数等级，四分位数等级偏差和频率百分比来衡量共识。

结果

在第一轮中，与会人员就提议的18个特征中的两个特征达成了共识。在第2轮中，除一个陈述外，所有陈述均达成共识。在第3轮中，参与者按优先级对特征进行排序，就设计和实施中应基于技术干预的特定方面在什么方面以及在什么程度上受到关注达成共识。

结论

这项研究为开发，评估和实施干预措施以解决年轻驾驶员的危险感知技能提供了指南。因此，我们的发现有助于在青年中发展适当和可接受的干预措施，以减少这种突发公共卫生事件。