This work presents the design, optimization, and a comparative study of a compound parabolic concentrator (CPC) using a tube as a receiver with and without a fin inverted V-shaped receiver (finned receiver). The study was mainly based on numerical analysis obtained by using a ray-tracing simulator in CPCs, in order to evaluate the amount of solar irradiation collected on four dates of the year. A north-south orientation was chosen, with and without a solar tracking system, at a fixed tilt angle of 32 and 0° for each case. The results showed that a CPC using a tubular receiver with a solar tracking system and a surface tilt of 32 and 0° reaches solar irradiation levels of 27.96 and 25.35 kWh/m², while a CPC with a finned receiver reaches 26.87 and 24.98 kWh/m², respectively. In the case of arrangements without a solar tracking system, the values reached were 7.03 and 5.60 kWh/m²for tubular receiver and 16.83 and 12.85 kWh/m² for the finned receiver, respectively. CPC with a tubular receiver proved to be more feasible when using a solar tracking system, in contrast to a CPC with a finned receiver, which had better feasibility in arrangements that do not include solar tracking.

这项工作介绍了复合抛物面浓缩器（CPC）的设计，优化和比较研究，该复合抛物面浓缩器使用管作为接收器，带有或不带有鳍状倒V形接收器（鳍状接收器）。该研究主要基于使用CPC中的光线跟踪模拟器获得的数值分析，以便评估一年中四个日期收集的太阳辐射量。在有和没有太阳能跟踪系统的情况下，选择的南北方向分别为固定倾斜角32和0°。结果表明，使用带有太阳跟踪系统且表面倾斜度为32和0˚的管状接收器的CPC可以达到27.96和25.35 kWh / m ^2的太阳辐射水平，而带有翅片接收器的CPC可以达到26.87和24.98 kWh / ²米， 分别。在安排没有太阳能跟踪系统的情况下，达到了值分别为7.03和5.60千瓦时/米²为管状接收器和16.83和12.85千瓦时/米² 分别为翅片接收机。与使用带翅片接收器的CPC相比，使用管状跟踪器的CPC证明在使用太阳能跟踪系统时更加可行，后者在不包括太阳跟踪的布置中具有更好的可行性。