当前位置: X-MOL 学术Entomol. Res. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Introduction and application of a composite insect trap for the National Ecosystem Survey of Korea
Entomological Research ( IF 1.2 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-30 , DOI: 10.1111/1748-5967.12477
Yong‐Gu Han 1 , Eui jeong Hong 1 , Do‐Sung Kim 2 , Chulgoo Kim 1 , Jin Yeol Cha 3
Affiliation  

This study aimed to establish the best applicable method for the National Ecosystem Survey (NES) guidelines by (i) verifying the efficiency of an insect trap that combined the Malaise trap, flight intercept trap, and pitfall trap (MFP trap) as part of the improvement for the terrestrial insect field in the fifth NES, and (ii) comparing the result with the currently used Malaise trap and pitfall trap (MP traps). We found that the efficiency of attaining species diversity was much higher with the added flight intercept trap function than the current Malaise trap alone for flying insect collection. For collecting ground insects, the efficiency of attaining species diversity of the pitfall trap from the MFP trap was lower than that from the MP trap. Besides, the Malaise trap of the MP trap showed superior efficiency than that of the MFP trap in species diversity. The results suggested that modification, supplementation, and re‐testing should be performed by analyzing various factors such as the trap material, barrier size, capturing container inlet, and mesh size, with consideration of the design of the current Malaise trap. Therefore, in survey‐based research, which aims at identifying insects species diversity and inhabiting status—such as the NES, it is necessary to introduce the MFP trap with the flight intercept trap function added to the Malaise trap function, and for the pitfall trap function of the MFP trap, it can be operated as a separate trap from the MFP trap.

中文翻译:

韩国国家生态系统调查复合捕虫器的介绍和应用

本研究旨在通过 (i) 验证结合 Malaise 陷阱、飞行拦截陷阱和陷阱陷阱(MFP 陷阱)的昆虫陷阱的效率,为国家生态系统调查 (NES) 指南建立最佳适用方法。改进第五个 NES 中的陆生昆虫场,以及 (ii) 将结果与当前使用的 Malaise 陷阱和陷阱陷阱(MP 陷阱)进行比较。我们发现,与目前单独使用 Malaise 陷阱收集飞虫相比,增加飞行拦截陷阱功能获得物种多样性的效率要高得多。对于收集地面昆虫,从 MFP 陷阱获取陷阱陷阱物种多样性的效率低于 MP 陷阱。除了,MP 陷阱的 Malaise 陷阱在物种多样性方面表现出优于 MFP 陷阱的效率。结果表明,应结合现有Malaise疏水阀的设计,通过分析疏水阀材料、屏障尺寸、捕集容器入口、网孔尺寸等多种因素进行修改、补充和重新测试。因此,在以调查为基础的研究中,以识别昆虫物种多样性和栖息地状况为目标——例如NES,有必要引入MFP陷阱,在Malaise陷阱功能的基础上增加飞行拦截陷阱功能,对于陷阱陷阱MFP 陷阱的功能,它可以作为一个独立于 MFP 陷阱的陷阱运行。重新测试应通过分析各种因素,如疏水阀材料、屏障尺寸、捕集容器入口和网孔尺寸,并考虑当前的萎靡不振疏水阀的设计来进行。因此,在以调查为基础的研究中,以识别昆虫物种多样性和栖息地状况为目标——例如NES,有必要引入MFP陷阱,在Malaise陷阱功能的基础上增加飞行拦截陷阱功能,对于陷阱陷阱MFP 陷阱的功能,它可以作为一个独立于 MFP 陷阱的陷阱运行。重新测试应通过分析各种因素,如疏水阀材料、屏障尺寸、捕集容器入口和网孔尺寸,并考虑当前的萎靡不振疏水阀的设计来进行。因此,在以调查为基础的研究中,以识别昆虫物种多样性和栖息地状况为目标——例如NES,有必要引入MFP陷阱,在Malaise陷阱功能的基础上增加飞行拦截陷阱功能,对于陷阱陷阱MFP 陷阱的功能,它可以作为一个独立于 MFP 陷阱的陷阱运行。
更新日期:2020-09-30
down
wechat
bug