Abstract Policy instruments have been initiated for addressing the severe problem of extensive construction equipment emissions (CEE) by governments around the world. Advanced and developing-economy promoters with distinctive background and constraints present differences in the development of CEE reduction policy instruments. However, there is little research looking into the evolving trends, lessons and accumulated experiences in the development of CEE reduction policy instruments. This study conducts a holistic review and analysis on the development of CEE reduction policy instruments from a global perspective. Three groups of policy instruments are identified, including the mandatory administration policy instrument (PI-A), the economic incentive policy instrument (PI-B), and the voluntary participation policy instrument (PI-C). Comparative analysis of CEE reduction policy instruments is conducted between advanced and developing-economy promoters. The results of this study show that both advanced and developing-economy promoters overwhelmingly prefer to adopt PI-As. Developing-economy promoters may not have sufficient resources for implementing PI-Bs and PI-Cs. Advanced-economy promoters have devoted more efforts to developing PI-Bs and PI-Cs. This research also suggested that a mixture of PI-As, PI-Bs and PI-Cs works better, and policy instruments should be selected considering the context of promoters. This research aims to promote experience-sharing between policymakers and provide them with significant insights for formulating more effective CEE reduction policy instruments.

中文翻译：

---

解决建筑设备排放的政策工具——全球视野的研究回顾

摘要 世界各国政府已经启动了政策工具来解决广泛的建筑设备排放 (CEE) 的严重问题。具有独特背景和限制的先进经济体和发展中经济体的推动者在制定减少中东欧的政策工具方面存在差异。然而，很少有研究关注制定减少中东欧的政策工具的发展趋势、教训和积累的经验。本研究从全球角度对 CEE 减排政策工具的发展进行了全面审查和分析。确定了三组政策工具，包括强制性行政政策工具（PI-A）、经济激励政策工具（PI-B）和自愿参与政策工具（PI-C）。在发达经济体和发展中经济体的推动者之间进行了中东欧减排政策工具的比较分析。这项研究的结果表明，发达经济体和发展中经济体的推动者绝大多数都更愿意采用 PI-As。发展中经济体的推动者可能没有足够的资源来实施 PI-B 和 PI-C。发达经济体的推动者更加努力地开发 PI-B 和 PI-C。这项研究还表明，PI-A、PI-B 和 PI-C 的混合效果更好，应考虑推动者的背景来选择政策工具。本研究旨在促进政策制定者之间的经验共享，并为他们制定更有效的减少中东欧的政策工具提供重要见解。