当前位置: X-MOL 学术Addict. Behav. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Experimental tasks of behavioral risk taking in alcohol administration studies: A systematic review
Addictive Behaviors ( IF 3.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-25 , DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106678
Daniel A Harmon 1 , Amie L Haas 1 , Alex Peterkin 1
Affiliation  

Research on emerging adults shows this population exhibits the highest rates of alcohol use and engages in the riskiest of behaviors (Boyer, 2006; Fromme, Corbin, & Kruse, 2008). Among experimental paradigms, prior reviews have established an increase in behavioral risk taking while under the influence of alcohol (Moskowitz & Robinson, 1988; Martin et al., 2013; Weafer & Fillmore, 2016). Previous research highlighted the importance of alcohol dose on behavioral risk taking and the lack of agreement on which psychometric tools are most accurate in assessing behavioral risk taking (Beulow & Blaine, 2015; King, Toule, De Wit, & Holdstock, 2002). This systematic review of experimental paradigms assessing the effects of the dose of alcohol on various behavioral risk taking tasks suggest that higher alcohol doses (0.6 g/kg and above) produces the most robust increase in behavioral risk taking across tasks, compared to lower doses of alcohol (<0.6 g/kg). Results suggest the BART is the most sensitive behavioral risk task used to detect increases in risk taking in moderate/higher doses compared to lower doses of alcohol. This review also highlights the difficulty in measuring behavioral risk taking, as behavioral risk taking is a complex, multifaceted phenomenon that may involve multiple constructs and means to capture it. Future research is needed to standardize experimental administration protocols, to aid in advancing the field of alcohol administration experiments, and to determine the most accurate measurement of behavioral risk taking.

Public Health Significance

Past experimental paradigms measuring behavioral risk taking under the influence of alcohol in emerging adults have used various alcohol administration paradigms, experimental protocols, and behavioral risk tasks. Key to examining behavioral risk taking via experimental paradigms should use at higher alcohol doses. Future interventions need to assess for levels of blood alcohol concentration when assessing for at-risk populations for alchol use disorders.



中文翻译:

酒精管理研究中行为冒险的实验任务:系统评价

对新兴成年人的研究表明,这一人群的酒精使用率最高,并从事最危险的行为(Boyer,2006 年;Fromme、Corbin 和 Kruse,2008 年)。在实验范式中,先前的评论已经确定在酒精影响下的行为风险增加(Moskowitz & Robinson, 1988; Martin et al., 2013; Weafer & Fillmore, 2016)。以前的研究强调了酒精剂量对行为风险承担的重要性,以及在哪些心理测量工具在评估行为风险承担方面最准确方面缺乏一致意见(Beulow & Blaine, 2015; King, Toule, De Wit, & Holdstock, 2002)。这项对评估酒精剂量对各种行为冒险任务影响的实验范式的系统评价表明,较高的酒精剂量 (0. 6 g/kg 及以上)与较低剂量的酒精(<0.6 g/kg)相比,在任务中的行为风险增加最为强劲。结果表明,与较低剂量的酒精相比,BART 是最敏感的行为风险任务,用于检测中等/较高剂量的风险增加。这篇综述还强调了衡量行为风险承担的难度,因为行为风险承担是一个复杂的、多方面的现象,可能涉及多种结构和捕捉它的方法。未来的研究需要标准化实验管理方案,以帮助推进酒精管理实验领域,并确定最准确的行为风险测量方法。6克/公斤)。结果表明,与较低剂量的酒精相比,BART 是最敏感的行为风险任务,用于检测中等/较高剂量的风险增加。这篇综述还强调了衡量行为风险承担的难度,因为行为风险承担是一个复杂的、多方面的现象,可能涉及多种结构和捕捉它的方法。未来的研究需要标准化实验管理方案,以帮助推进酒精管理实验领域,并确定最准确的行为风险测量方法。6克/公斤)。结果表明,与较低剂量的酒精相比,BART 是最敏感的行为风险任务,用于检测中等/较高剂量的风险增加。这篇综述还强调了衡量行为风险承担的难度,因为行为风险承担是一个复杂的、多方面的现象,可能涉及多种结构和捕捉它的方法。未来的研究需要标准化实验管理方案,以帮助推进酒精管理实验领域,并确定最准确的行为风险测量方法。因为行为冒险是一种复杂的、多方面的现象,可能涉及多种结构和捕捉它的方法。未来的研究需要标准化实验管理方案,以帮助推进酒精管理实验领域,并确定最准确的行为风险测量方法。因为行为冒险是一种复杂的、多方面的现象,可能涉及多种结构和捕捉它的方法。未来的研究需要标准化实验管理方案,以帮助推进酒精管理实验领域,并确定最准确的行为风险测量方法。

公共卫生意义

过去测量新兴成年人在酒精影响下的行为风险的实验范式使用了各种酒精管理范式、实验方案和行为风险任务。通过实验范式检查行为风险的关键应该在更高的酒精剂量下使用。在评估高危人群的酒精使用障碍时,未来的干预措施需要评估血液中的酒精浓度水平。

更新日期:2020-10-13
down
wechat
bug