The aim of this study was to identify effective work place intervention strategies for the prevention of low back pain (LBP). The study focused on interventions to two major groups: personal interventions and technical interventions. Data basis were searched for with inclusion criteria: study design based on randomised controlled trial; outcome measures including non-specific LBP occurrence expressed by prevalence or intensity; intervention met the definition of the technical and/or personal (physical exercises, behavioural training, educational) intervention programme. Eighteen papers were selected for full analysis. The diversification of quantitative indicators of differences between control and intervention groups were carried out using Cohen’s d index. The results of analysis showed strong differences in effects among intervention strategies, as well as among different cases within similar intervention strategies. LBP severity before intervention and the length of intervention were discussed as potentially influencing factors. The results of the analysis suggest that the most effective strategies for LBP prevention include technical modifications of the workstand and education based on practical training. Behavioural and physical training seems to be of lesser importance. LBP severity before intervention and the time when the measurements of outcome measures take place play an important role in the effectiveness of intervention.

这项研究的目的是确定预防腰痛（LBP）的有效工作场所干预策略。该研究集中于对两个主要群体的干预：个人干预和技术干预。用纳入标准搜索数据基础：基于随机对照试验的研究设计；结果测量，包括以患病率或强度表示的非特异性LBP发生；干预措施符合技术和/或个人（体育锻炼，行为培训，教育）干预方案的定义。选择18篇论文进行全面分析。对照组和干预组之间差异的定量指标的多样化使用Cohen d指数进行。分析结果显示干预策略之间的效果存在很大差异，以及类似干预策略中的不同案例。讨论了干预前LBP的严重程度和干预时间是可能的影响因素。分析结果表明，预防LBP的最有效策略包括对工作台进行技术改造和基于实际培训的教育。行为和体育锻炼似乎不太重要。干预前的LBP严重程度和进行结果测量的时间在干预的有效性中起着重要作用。分析结果表明，预防LBP的最有效策略包括对工作台进行技术改造和基于实际培训的教育。行为和体育锻炼似乎不太重要。干预前的LBP严重程度和进行结果测量的时间在干预的有效性中起着重要作用。分析结果表明，预防LBP的最有效策略包括对工作台进行技术改造和基于实际培训的教育。行为和体育锻炼似乎不太重要。干预前的LBP严重程度和进行结果测量的时间在干预的有效性中起着重要作用。