Comments on the article by T. B. Henley (see record 2020-68859-001). Scholarly attempts to broaden the scope of the historical investigation of psychology are welcome. To the extent that Henley's article seeks to do just that, it provides an important corrective to the traditional approach. The question remains, however, whether the prehistoric developments presented in the article can indeed teach us something about the history of psychology (broadly defined), and more fundamentally, whether they can at all be described as "psychological" in any meaningful way. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

中文翻译：

---

“一个单词的意思很重要”：对史前心理学的思考。

TB Henley对文章的评论（请参阅记录2020-68859-001）。欢迎学术界扩大心理学历史研究范围的尝试。在某种程度上，亨利的文章试图做到这一点，它为传统方法提供了重要的修正。但是，问题仍然存在，即本文中介绍的史前发展是否确实可以教给我们关于心理学史（广泛定义）的一些知识，更重要的是，是否可以以任何有意义的方式将其描述为“心理学”。（PsycInfo数据库记录（c）2020 APA，保留所有权利）。