当前位置: X-MOL 学术Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Treatment of compulsive buying disorder: comparing the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy with person-centred experiential counselling
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy ( IF 2.0 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-15 , DOI: 10.1017/s1352465820000521
Stephen Kellett 1, 2 , Pippa Oxborough 1 , Chris Gaskell 1
Affiliation  

Background:Outcome studies of the treatment of compulsive buying disorder (CBD) have rarely compared the effectiveness of differing active treatments.Aims:This study sought to compare the effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and person-centred experiential therapy (PCE) in a cross-over design.Method:This was an ABC single case experimental design with extended follow-up with a female patient meeting diagnostic criteria for CBD. Ideographic CBD outcomes were intensively measured over a continuous 350-day time series. Following a 1-month baseline assessment phase (A; 28 days; three sessions), CBT was delivered via 13 out-patient sessions (B: 160 days) and then PCE was delivered via six out-patient sessions (C: 63 days). There was a 99-day follow-up period.Results:Frequency and duration of compulsive buying episodes decreased during active treatment. CBT and PCE were both highly effective compared with baseline for reducing shopping obsessions, excitement about shopping, compulsion to shop and improving self-esteem. When the PCE and CBT treatment phases were compared against each other, few differences were apparent in terms of outcome. There was no evidence of any relapse over the follow-up period. A reliable and clinically significant change on the primary nomothetic measure (i.e. Compulsive Buying Scale) was retained over time.Conclusions:The study suggests that both CBT and PCE can be effective for CBD. Methodological limitations and suggestions for future CBD outcome research are discussed.

中文翻译:

强迫性购买障碍的治疗:比较认知行为疗法与以人为本的体验式咨询的有效性

背景:强迫性购买障碍 (CBD) 治疗的结果研究很少比较不同积极治疗的有效性。目的:本研究旨在比较认知行为疗法 (CBT) 和以人为本的体验疗法 (PCE) 在交叉设计。方法:这是一项 ABC 单病例实验设计,对一名符合 CBD 诊断标准的女性患者进行了延长随访。在连续 350 天的时间序列中集中测量表意 CBD 结果。在 1 个月的基线评估阶段(A;28 天;3 个疗程)之后,通过 13 个门诊疗程(B:160 天)提供 CBT,然后通过 6 个门诊疗程(C:63 天)提供 PCE . 有99天的随访期。结果:在积极治疗期间,强迫购买事件的频率和持续时间减少。与基线相比,CBT 和 PCE 在减少购物痴迷、购物兴奋、购物冲动和提高自尊方面都非常有效。当 PCE 和 CBT 治疗阶段相互比较时,在结果方面几乎没有明显差异。在随访期间没有任何复发的证据。随着时间的推移,主要标准测量(即强迫购买量表)的可靠和临床显着变化被保留。结论:研究表明,CBT 和 PCE 对 CBD 都有效。讨论了未来 CBD 结果研究的方法学限制和建议。对购物的兴奋、购物的冲动和提高自尊心。当 PCE 和 CBT 治疗阶段相互比较时,在结果方面几乎没有明显差异。在随访期间没有任何复发的证据。随着时间的推移,主要标准测量(即强迫购买量表)的可靠和临床显着变化被保留。结论:研究表明,CBT 和 PCE 对 CBD 都有效。讨论了未来 CBD 结果研究的方法学限制和建议。对购物的兴奋、购物的冲动和提高自尊心。当 PCE 和 CBT 治疗阶段相互比较时,在结果方面几乎没有明显差异。在随访期间没有任何复发的证据。随着时间的推移,主要标准测量(即强迫购买量表)的可靠和临床显着变化被保留。结论:研究表明,CBT 和 PCE 对 CBD 都有效。讨论了未来 CBD 结果研究的方法学限制和建议。随着时间的推移,主要标准测量(即强迫购买量表)的可靠和临床显着变化被保留。结论:研究表明,CBT 和 PCE 对 CBD 都有效。讨论了未来 CBD 结果研究的方法学限制和建议。随着时间的推移,主要标准测量(即强迫购买量表)的可靠和临床显着变化被保留。结论:研究表明,CBT 和 PCE 对 CBD 都有效。讨论了未来 CBD 结果研究的方法学限制和建议。
更新日期:2020-09-15
down
wechat
bug