当前位置: X-MOL 学术Breast Cancer Res. Treat. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Risk factors for implant failure following revision surgery in breast cancer patients with a previous immediate implant-based breast reconstruction.
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment ( IF 3.8 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-12 , DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05911-z
A Frisell 1 , J Lagergren 1, 2 , M Halle 1, 3 , J de Boniface 1, 2
Affiliation  

PURPOSE The aim of the current study was to evaluate risk factors and timing of revision surgery following immediate implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). METHODS This retrospective cohort included women with a previous therapeutic mastectomy and implant-based IBR who had undergone implant revision surgery between 2005 and 2015. Data were collected by medical chart review and registered in the Stockholm Breast Reconstruction Database. The primary endpoint was implant removal due to surgical complications, i.e. implant failure. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 475 women with 707 revisions in 542 breasts. Overall, 33 implants were removed due to complications. The implant failure rate (4.7%) was lower without RT (2.4%) compared to RT administered after mastectomy (7.5%) and prior to IBR (6.5%) (p = 0.007). While post-mastectomy RT (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.53-7.53), smoking (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.76-8.65) and diabetes (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.05-27.85) were confirmed as risk factors, time from completion of RT (> 9 months, 6-9 months, < 6 months) was not (OR 3.17, 95% CI 0.78-12.80, and OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.20-2.71). Additional risk factors were a previous axillary clearance (OR 4.91, 95% CI 2.09-11.53) and a history of a post-IBR infection (OR 15.52, 95% CI 4.15-58.01, and OR 12.93, 95% CI 3.04-55.12, for oral and intravenous antibiotics, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Previous axillary clearance and a history of post-IBR infection emerged as novel risk factors for implant failure after revision surgery. While known risk factors were confirmed, time elapsed from RT completion to revision surgery did not influence the outcome in this analysis.

中文翻译:

乳腺癌患者修复手术后植入失败的危险因素,之前进行过即刻植入式乳房重建。

目的 本研究的目的是评估基于即刻植入物的乳房重建 (IBR) 后翻修手术的风险因素和时机。方法 该回顾性队列包括在 2005 年至 2015 年间接受过种植体修复手术的既往治疗性乳房切除术和基于植入物的 IBR 的女性。数据通过医疗图表审查收集并在斯德哥尔摩乳房重建数据库中登记。主要终点是由于手术并发症(即种植体失败)导致的种植体移除。结果 该队列包括 475 名女性,其中 542 个乳房进行了 707 次翻修。总共有 33 个种植体因并发症而被移除。与乳房切除术后 (7.5%) 和 IBR 前 (6.5%) 相比,无放疗 (2.4%) 的种植体失败率 (4.7%) 较低 (p = 0.007)。虽然乳房切除术后放疗 (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.53-7.53)、吸烟 (OR 3.90, 95% CI 1.76-8.65) 和糖尿病 (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.05-27.85) 被确认为危险因素,RT 完成时间(> 9 个月,6 -9 个月,< 6 个月)不是(OR 3.17,95% CI 0.78-12.80,OR 0.74,95% CI 0.20-2.71)。其他风险因素是既往腋窝清除(OR 4.91,95% CI 2.09-11.53)和 IBR 后感染史(OR 15.52,95% CI 4.15-58.01,和 OR 12.93,95% CI 3.04-55.12,分别用于口服和静脉注射抗生素)。结论 先前的腋窝清除和 IBR 术后感染史成为翻修手术后种植体失败的新危险因素。虽然已知的风险因素得到确认,但从 RT 完成到翻修手术的时间并未影响本分析中的结果。65) 和糖尿病 (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.05-27.85) 被确认为危险因素,完成 RT 的时间(> 9 个月、6-9 个月、< 6 个月)不是(OR 3.17,95% CI 0.78) -12.80 和 OR 0.74,95% CI 0.20-2.71)。其他风险因素是既往腋窝清除(OR 4.91,95% CI 2.09-11.53)和 IBR 后感染史(OR 15.52,95% CI 4.15-58.01,和 OR 12.93,95% CI 3.04-55.12,分别用于口服和静脉注射抗生素)。结论 先前的腋窝清除和 IBR 术后感染史成为翻修手术后种植体失败的新危险因素。虽然已知的风险因素得到确认,但从 RT 完成到翻修手术的时间并未影响本分析中的结果。65) 和糖尿病 (OR 5.40, 95% CI 1.05-27.85) 被确认为危险因素,完成 RT 的时间(> 9 个月、6-9 个月、< 6 个月)不是(OR 3.17,95% CI 0.78) -12.80 和 OR 0.74,95% CI 0.20-2.71)。其他风险因素是既往腋窝清除(OR 4.91,95% CI 2.09-11.53)和 IBR 后感染史(OR 15.52,95% CI 4.15-58.01,和 OR 12.93,95% CI 3.04-55.12,分别用于口服和静脉注射抗生素)。结论 先前的腋窝清除和 IBR 术后感染史成为翻修手术后种植体失败的新危险因素。虽然已知的风险因素得到确认,但从 RT 完成到翻修手术的时间并未影响本分析中的结果。6-9 个月,< 6 个月)不是(OR 3.17,95% CI 0.78-12.80,和 OR 0.74,95% CI 0.20-2.71)。其他风险因素是既往腋窝清除(OR 4.91,95% CI 2.09-11.53)和 IBR 后感染史(OR 15.52,95% CI 4.15-58.01,和 OR 12.93,95% CI 3.04-55.12,分别用于口服和静脉注射抗生素)。结论 先前的腋窝清除和 IBR 术后感染史成为翻修手术后种植体失败的新危险因素。虽然已知的风险因素得到确认,但从 RT 完成到翻修手术的时间并未影响本分析中的结果。6-9 个月,< 6 个月)不是(OR 3.17,95% CI 0.78-12.80,和 OR 0.74,95% CI 0.20-2.71)。其他风险因素是既往腋窝清除(OR 4.91,95% CI 2.09-11.53)和 IBR 后感染史(OR 15.52,95% CI 4.15-58.01,和 OR 12.93,95% CI 3.04-55.12,分别用于口服和静脉注射抗生素)。结论 先前的腋窝清除和 IBR 术后感染史成为翻修手术后种植体失败的新危险因素。虽然已知的风险因素得到确认,但从 RT 完成到翻修手术的时间并未影响本分析中的结果。52、95% CI 4.15-58.01 和 OR 12.93、95% CI 3.04-55.12,分别用于口服和静脉抗生素)。结论 先前的腋窝清除和 IBR 术后感染史成为翻修手术后种植体失败的新危险因素。虽然已知的风险因素得到确认,但从 RT 完成到翻修手术的时间并未影响本分析中的结果。52、95% CI 4.15-58.01 和 OR 12.93、95% CI 3.04-55.12,分别用于口服和静脉抗生素)。结论 先前的腋窝清除和 IBR 术后感染史成为翻修手术后种植体失败的新危险因素。虽然已知的风险因素得到确认,但从 RT 完成到翻修手术的时间并未影响本分析中的结果。
更新日期:2020-09-12
down
wechat
bug