L. J. Hayes and Fryling (2019) defend Interbehaviorism against criticisms that it represents Descriptive Contextualism and present an argument for how Interbehaviorism might be more serviceable than Functional Contextualism and Radical Behaviorism. This commentary explores ways in which Interbehaviorism might be serviceable to both the current-day and future science of behavior. We discuss similarities between Interbehaviorism and other perspectives, justify the need for an updated perspective on dualism, explore pragmatism in light of the authors’ criticisms of truth criteria, and share applications of Interbehaviorism with potential utility for improving the human condition.

LJ Hayes和Fryling（2019）捍卫行为间主义，反对批评它代表描述性情境主义，并提出一个论点，即行为间主义可能比功能性情境主义和激进行为主义更有用。该评论探讨了行为间主义可能适用于当今和未来行为科学的方式。我们讨论了行为主义与其他观点之间的相似之处，证明有必要更新二元论的观点，根据作者对真理标准的批评探讨实用主义，并分享行为主义的应用与改善人类状况的潜在效用。