Objective Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) has demonstrated effectiveness as a therapeutic approach for various clinical disorders, but little data exist on the extent to which it is covered in accredited postgraduate clinical psychology training programs. Data were gathered regarding aspects of CBT orientation in terms of influence, content, delivery of general programs, and administration of coursework components. Method Responses to a semi‐structured interview of 28 clinical program directors of Australian accredited courses (representing 72% of accredited courses) were analysed as part of a larger project titled “Nationwide Training in Cognitive Behaviour Therapy.” Results CBT was consistently included in training programs, but there was marked variability in the coverage of CBT competencies. Greater emphasis was placed on foundational CBT competencies (57% of programs indicating basic CBT skills were covered to a “large” or “very large extent”), in contrast to problem specific competencies (11% of programs covered to a “large” or “very large extent”). Programs with a stronger orientation towards evidence‐based practice reported greater coverage of Roth and Pilling's CBT competency framework (r = 0.62, p < 0.01). Conclusion The findings suggest that core CBT skills are covered, but there is an opportunity for these clinical training programs to enhance their coursework content to ensure that their trainees are adequately prepared to deliver CBT for different disorders.

中文翻译：

---

认知行为治疗能力在多大程度上融入临床心理学培训？澳大利亚大学的全国调查

客观认知行为疗法 (CBT) 已证明作为各种临床疾病的治疗方法是有效的，但关于它在认可的研究生临床心理学培训计划中的覆盖程度的数据很少。收集了有关 CBT 定向方面的数据，包括影响、内容、一般课程的交付和课程作业组件的管理。方法 对澳大利亚认可课程的 28 名临床项目主管（占认可课程的 72%）的半结构化访谈的回应作为名为“全国认知行为治疗培训”的更大项目的一部分进行分析。结果 CBT 始终包含在培训计划中，但 CBT 能力的覆盖范围存在显着差异。与特定问题的能力相比（11% 的课程涵盖“大”或“大范围”），更加强调基础的 CBT 能力（57% 的表明基本 CBT 技能的课程涵盖了“大”或“非常大的范围”）。 “很大程度”）。更注重循证实践的项目报告说，Roth 和 Pilling 的 CBT 能力框架覆盖面更大（r = 0.62，p < 0.01）。结论 研究结果表明，核心 CBT 技能已涵盖在内，但这些临床培训计划有机会增强其课程内容，以确保受训者为针对不同疾病提供 CBT 做好充分准备。与特定问题的能力形成对比（11% 的课程涵盖“大”或“非常大”）。更注重循证实践的项目报告说，Roth 和 Pilling 的 CBT 能力框架覆盖面更大（r = 0.62，p < 0.01）。结论 研究结果表明，核心 CBT 技能已涵盖在内，但这些临床培训计划有机会增强其课程内容，以确保受训者为针对不同疾病提供 CBT 做好充分准备。与特定问题的能力（11% 的课程涵盖“大”或“非常大”）形成对比。更注重循证实践的项目报告说，Roth 和 Pilling 的 CBT 能力框架覆盖面更大（r = 0.62，p < 0.01）。结论 研究结果表明，核心 CBT 技能已涵盖在内，但这些临床培训计划有机会增强其课程内容，以确保受训者为针对不同疾病提供 CBT 做好充分准备。