当前位置: X-MOL 学术IEEE Access › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Conflicts of automated driving with conventional traffic infrastructure
IEEE Access ( IF 3.4 ) Pub Date : 2020-01-01 , DOI: 10.1109/access.2020.3020653
Henrietta Lengyel , Tamas Tettamanti , Zsolt Szalay

Road traffic signals and traffic infrastructure have a significant impact on the behaviour of highly automated or autonomous vehicles. However, the increase in automation does not always mean an advantage. Generally, highly automated vehicles strictly follow the traffic rules resulting in near-accident situations, although their goal is to avoid and reduce them. Malfunctions of the automated functions might cause surprising interventions while the vehicle is in motion, drivers cannot react in time and well. This paper highlights the potential danger and uncertainty of highly automated or autonomous vehicles in the context of the current conventional traffic infrastructure system. In the future, special consideration shall be given to the vehicle industry and traffic regulation makers on how the infrastructure should be adapted to automated vehicle functions to have a seamless shift towards automated driving. The paper sums up many problematic situations with two critical problems with sensitivity analysis. The first situation: the speed assist system (based on speed limit sign recognition) conflicts with the traffic infrastructure. The second situation is shown: the ACC (Adaptive Cruise Control) and LKA (Lane Assist) contradicts with the traffic infrastructure. These critical situations were investigated by using an high-fidelity automotive simulation software as proof of concept and were examined by accident reconstruction analysis software.

中文翻译:

自动驾驶与传统交通基础设施的冲突

道路交通信号和交通基础设施对高度自动化或自动驾驶汽车的行为有重大影响。然而,自动化的增加并不总是意味着优势。一般来说,高度自动化的车辆严格遵守交通规则,导致接近事故的情况,尽管它们的目标是避免和减少它们。当车辆行驶时,自动功能的故障可能会导致意外干预,驾驶员无法及时做出反应。本文强调了在当前传统交通基础设施系统的背景下高度自动化或自主车辆的潜在危险和不确定性。将来,汽车行业和交通法规制定者应特别考虑基础设施如何适应自动驾驶汽车功能,以实现向自动驾驶的无缝转变。论文以敏感性分析的两个关键问题总结了许多有问题的情况。第一种情况:速度辅助系统(基于限速标志识别)与交通基础设施发生冲突。显示了第二种情况:ACC(自适应巡航控制)和LKA(车道辅助)与交通基础设施相矛盾。通过使用高保真汽车仿真软件作为概念验证来研究这些危急情况,并通过事故重建分析软件进行检查。论文以敏感性分析的两个关键问题总结了许多有问题的情况。第一种情况:速度辅助系统(基于限速标志识别)与交通基础设施发生冲突。显示了第二种情况:ACC(自适应巡航控制)和LKA(车道辅助)与交通基础设施相矛盾。通过使用高保真汽车仿真软件作为概念验证来研究这些危急情况,并通过事故重建分析软件进行检查。论文以敏感性分析的两个关键问题总结了许多有问题的情况。第一种情况:速度辅助系统(基于限速标志识别)与交通基础设施发生冲突。显示了第二种情况:ACC(自适应巡航控制)和LKA(车道辅助)与交通基础设施相矛盾。通过使用高保真汽车仿真软件作为概念验证来研究这些危急情况,并通过事故重建分析软件进行检查。ACC(自适应巡航控制)和 LKA(车道辅助)与交通基础设施相矛盾。通过使用高保真汽车仿真软件作为概念验证来研究这些危急情况,并通过事故重建分析软件进行检查。ACC(自适应巡航控制)和 LKA(车道辅助)与交通基础设施相矛盾。通过使用高保真汽车仿真软件作为概念验证来研究这些危急情况,并通过事故重建分析软件进行检查。
更新日期:2020-01-01
down
wechat
bug