当前位置: X-MOL 学术Finance Stoch. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Prospective strict no-arbitrage and the fundamental theorem of asset pricing under transaction costs
Finance and Stochastics ( IF 1.7 ) Pub Date : 2019-09-05 , DOI: 10.1007/s00780-019-00403-5
Christoph Kühn , Alexander Molitor

In discrete-time markets with proportional transaction costs, Schachermayer (Math. Financ. 14:19–48, 2004) showed that robust no-arbitrage is equivalent to the existence of a strictly consistent price system. In this paper, we introduce the concept of prospective strict no-arbitrage that is a variant of the strict no-arbitrage property from Kabanov et al. (Finance Stoch. 6:371–382, 2002). The prospective strict no-arbitrage condition is slightly weaker than the robust no-arbitrage condition, and it implies that the set of portfolios attainable from zero initial endowment is closed in probability. A weak version of prospective strict no-arbitrage turns out to be equivalent to the existence of a consistent price system. In contrast to the fundamental theorem of asset pricing of Schachermayer (Math. Financ. 14:19–48, 2004), the consistent frictionless prices may lie on the boundary of the bid–ask spread. On the technical level, a crucial difference to Schachermayer (Math. Financ. 14:19–48, 2004) and Kabanov et al. (Finance Stoch. 7:403–411, 2003) is that we prove closedness without having at hand that the null-strategies form a linear space.

中文翻译:

准严格无套利和交易成本下资产定价的基本定理

在具有成比例交易成本的离散时间市场中,Schachermayer(Math。Financ。14:19-48,2004)表明,稳健的无套利行为等同于存在严格一致的价格体系。在本文中,我们引入的概念预期严格的无套利这是一个变种严格的无套利Kabanov等人的财产。(Finance Stoch。6:371–382,2002)。预期的严格无套利条件比健壮的无套利条件稍弱,这意味着从零初始end赋中可获得的投资组合的概率是封闭的。预期的严格无套利的弱势形式等同于存在一致的价格体系。与Schachermayer资产定价的基本定理(Math。Financ。14:19-48,2004)相反,一致的无摩擦价格可能位于买卖价差的边界。在技​​术层面上,与Schachermayer(Math。Financ。14:19-48,2004)和Kabanov等人的论文有重大区别。(Finance Stoch。7:403-411,2003)是,我们证明了封闭性,而无需立即掌握零策略形成一个线性空间。
更新日期:2019-09-05
down
wechat
bug