The “scientisation” of climate change, which placed the issue beyond democratic debate by declaring it a matter for the scientific expertise of the IPCC, has not provoked the required political and economic action to resolve it. “Tipping point” rhetoric and apocalyptic fictions, conveying increased urgency and shaming the present‐day, appear also to yield diminishing returns. Instead of representing the present as a binary choice—catastrophe or salvation—a Humanities‐informed viewpoint would represent past, present, and future in terms of unknowability, frailty, unavoidable interpretation, and limited agency.

中文翻译：

---

永远不要太早，永远都不要太晚：对气候暂时性的思考

气候变化的“科学化”使这个问题超出了民主辩论的范围，因为它宣布了IPCC的科学专长，这并没有激起解决该问题所需的政治和经济行动。如今，表达紧迫感和羞辱感的“尖头”修辞和世界末日小说似乎也带来了越来越少的回报。人文主义的观点不是将当前表示为灾难或救赎的二元选择，而是从不可知，脆弱，不可避免的解释和有限的能力方面代表了过去，现在和未来。