当前位置: X-MOL 学术Sci. Progess › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Modeling and detection of the prepared tool edge radius.
Science Progress ( IF 2.6 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-21 , DOI: 10.1177/0036850420957903
Zhao Xuefeng 1 , Li Hui 1 , He Lin 1 , Tao Meng 1
Affiliation  

Introduction:

High-speed and high-efficient machining is the inevitable development direction of machining technology. The tool edge preparation can improve the life, cutting performance, and surface quality of a tool and help to achieve high-speed and efficient machining. Therefore, precise modeling and detection of the micron-level contour of a tool edge are crucial for edge preparation. The aim of this study is to provide the model and detect method of the prepared tool edge radius.

Methods:

The mathematical model of the milling tool trajectory is established through the Matlab. The material removal model by single abrasive particle is established based on the energy conservation principle and energy absorption theory. The material removal model by multiple abrasive grains on the cutting tool edge is constructed using the statistical methods. The mathematical model of the edge radius is established through the geometrical relationship. The milling edge preparation contour detection system is setup based on the machine vision principle through LabVIEW software. Finally, the edge radius at different process parameters is determined by the mathematical model and detection system, and the results are compared with the results of the scanning electron microscopic measurement (SEM).

Results:

Through the Comparison and analysis of the edge radius measured by the SEM and calculated by the proposed model. The maximum error between the analytical results and SEM measurements is 11.18 μm, while the minimum error is 0.07 μm. Through the comparison and analysis of the edge radius measured by the SEM and the edge detection system. The maximum difference between the two methods is 2.71 μm, and the minimum difference is 0.31 μm. The maximum difference in percentage is 9.2%, and the minimum difference in percentage is 1.2%.

Discussions:

The edge preparation mechanisms of a single particle and multiple particles on the tool edge are explained. A mathematical model of the edge radius is established, which provides a basis for a deeper understanding of the edge preparation effect. Based on the machine vision principle, the prepared tool micron-level edge detection method is proposed. The histogram specification method, median filtering, multi-threshold segmentation method, and Canny edge detection operator are adopted to obtain the edge contour. The comparison result shows that the mathematical model of the edge radius is accurate, and the proposed tool edge detection method is feasible, which lays the foundation for edge preparation and realization of high-speed and high-efficient machining.



中文翻译:

准备好的刀具刃口半径的建模和检测。

介绍:

高速高效加工是加工技术的必然发展方向。刀具刃口处理可以提高刀具的寿命、切削性能和表面质量,有助于实现高速高效加工。因此,刀具刃口微米级轮廓的精确建模和检测对于刃口制备至关重要。本研究的目的是提供预备刀具刃口半径的模型和检测方法。

方法:

通过Matlab建立了铣削刀具运动轨迹的数学模型。基于能量守恒原理和能量吸收理论,建立了单磨粒材料去除模型。采用统计方法构建了切削刀具刃口上多个磨粒的材料去除模型。通过几何关系建立了边缘半径的数学模型。基于机器视觉原理,通过LabVIEW软件搭建铣削备边轮廓检测系统。最后,通过数学模型和检测系统确定不同工艺参数下的边缘半径,并将结果与​​扫描电子显微镜测量(SEM)的结果进行比较。

结果:

通过对SEM测量的边缘半径与所提出的模型计算的边缘半径进行比较和分析。分析结果与SEM测量之间的最大误差为11.18 μm,最小误差为0.07 μm。通过对SEM与边缘检测系统测得的边缘半径进行对比分析。两种方法最大差异为2.71μm,最小差异为0.31μm。百分比差异最大为 9.2%,百分比差异最小为 1.2%。

讨论:

解释了刀具刃口上单个颗粒和多个颗粒的边缘处理机制。建立了刃口半径的数学模型,为更深入地理解刃口处理效果提供了基础。基于机器视觉原理,提出了制备刀具微米级边缘检测方法。采用直方图规范法、中值滤波、多阈值分割法、Canny边缘检测算子来获取边缘轮廓。对比结果表明,刃口半径数学模型准确,所提出的刀具刃口检测方法可行,为刃口准备和实现高速高效加工奠定了基础。

更新日期:2020-09-21
down
wechat
bug