当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Appl. Ecol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Citizen science versus professional data collection: Comparison of approaches to mosquito monitoring in Germany
Journal of Applied Ecology ( IF 5.7 ) Pub Date : 2020-10-06 , DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13767
Nadja Pernat 1, 2, 3 , Helge Kampen 4 , Jonathan M. Jeschke 2, 3, 5 , Doreen Werner 1, 3
Affiliation  

Mosquito monitoring data from active surveillance with BG-Sentinel traps from 2011 to 2017 and from passive surveillance - submissions to the "Muckenatlas" - between the years 2012 to 2017. The two different data sets are in one table, but separable by the table column "method". Locations of traps and submissions are not available due to data privacy regulations. The columns "bio.o" and "biocat" are only available for the passive surveillance entries as they depend on the participants notations about find spot that are not given in case of active surveillance by professional scientists.

中文翻译:

公民科学与专业数据收集:德国蚊子监测方法的比较

2011 年至 2017 年使用 BG-Sentinel 陷阱主动监测的蚊子监测数据以及 2012 年至 2017 年间被动监测(提交给“Muckenatlas”)的蚊子监测数据。两个不同的数据集在一张表中,但可通过表格列分开“方法”。由于数据隐私规定,陷阱和提交的位置不可用。“bio.o”和“biocat”列仅适用于被动监视条目,因为它们取决于参与者关于发现点的符号,而专业科学家在主动监视的情况下不会给出这些符号。
更新日期:2020-10-06
down
wechat
bug