ABSTRACT To date, open science, particularly open data, in psychology has focused on quantitative research. This article aims to explore ethical and practical issues encountered by UK-based psychologists utilising open qualitative datasets. Semi-structured telephone interviews with eight qualitative psychologists were explored using a framework analysis. From the findings, we offer a context-consent meta-framework as a resource to help in the design of studies sharing their data and/or studies using open data. We recommend secondary studies conduct archaeologies of context and consent to examine if the data available are suitable for their research questions. This research is the first we know of in the study of “doing” (or not doing) open science, which could be repeated to develop a longitudinal picture or complemented with additional approaches, such as observational studies of how context and consent are negotiated in preregistered studies and open data.

中文翻译：

---

用于设计开放（定性）数据研究的上下文同意元框架

摘要 迄今为止，心理学中的开放科学，尤其是开放数据，主要集中在定量研究上。本文旨在利用开放的定性数据集探索英国心理学家遇到的伦理和实践问题。使用框架分析探索了对八位定性心理学家的半结构化电话采访。根据调查结果，我们提供了一个上下文同意元框架作为资源，以帮助设计共享数据和/或使用开放数据的研究。我们建议二次研究进行背景考古学，并同意检查可用数据是否适合他们的研究问题。这项研究是我们在“做”（或不做）开放科学的研究中所知道的第一项研究，可以重复进行以形成纵向图或补充其他方法，