当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Forensic Psychol. Practi. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Mental Abnormalities in Sexually Violent Predator Evaluations: Ethical Use of Paraphilic Disorder Diagnoses
Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice Pub Date : 2019-01-22 , DOI: 10.1080/24732850.2018.1556541
Georgia M. Winters 1 , Cynthia Calkins 1 , Emily Greene-Colozzi 1 , Elizabeth L. Jeglic 1
Affiliation  

Forensic psychologists and psychiatrists are regularly called upon to conduct sexually violent predator (SVP) evaluations. Commonly, the DSM-5 diagnostic category of paraphilic disorders is used to establish whether an offender has a mental abnormality outlined by the SVP laws. Importantly, the use of paraphilic disorders to establish the mental abnormality criterion has given rise to several ethical concerns, including questions related to validity and reliability. The diagnoses of unspecified paraphilic disorder and other specified paraphilic disorder (including the nonconsent and hebephilia specifiers) have been especially controversial. Therefore, the present article will explore the use of paraphilic disorder diagnoses in the context of SVP evaluations, with emphasis on the other specified paraphilic disorder (OSPD) and unspecified paraphilic disorder (UPD) categories. Moreover, we provide relevant ethical considerations and recommendations for clinicians conducting SVP evaluations in light of the guidelines set forth by the American Psychological Association’s Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct and the American Psychological Association’s Specialty Guidelines in Forensic Psychology.



中文翻译:

性暴力掠食者评估中的心理异常:副友病诊断的伦理用途

定期要求法医心理学家和精神科医生进行性暴力掠食者(SVP)评估。通常,DSM-5诊断为副产品性疾病的类别是用来确定罪犯是否具有SVP法律所概述的精神异常。重要的是,使用副友病建立精神异常标准已经引起了一些道德方面的关注,包括与有效性和可靠性有关的问题。未明确说明的亲友病和其他具体说明的亲友病(包括未同意和hebephilia指定者)的诊断尤其引起争议。因此,本文将探讨在SVP评估的背景下对副交往性疾病诊断的使用,重点是其他指定的副交往性疾病(OSPD)和未指定的副交往性疾病(UPD)类别。此外,

更新日期:2019-01-22
down
wechat
bug