Abstract We investigated whether group influence can change judgments even for high-consensus (i.e., unambiguous) moral norms. We found that participants often matched the judgment of the other current group members even when this moral judgment was normatively incorrect (nonstandard), and this occurred more for more ambiguous issues. Moreover, this social influence on public judgments was generally followed by private agreement and re-interpreting general values to be consistent with those judgements. We also found that participants who experienced a fit between their regulatory focus and their feelings of power (i.e., promotion/high power; prevention/low power) were less influenced by the group.

中文翻译：

---

当群体影响或多或少时：道德判断的案例

摘要 我们调查了群体影响是否可以改变即使对于高度一致（即明确）的道德规范的判断。我们发现，即使这种道德判断在规范上不正确（非标准），参与者也经常与其他当前小组成员的判断相匹配，而且这种情况更多发生在更模糊的问题上。此外，这种对公共判断的社会影响通常伴随着私人协议和重新解释与这些判断一致的一般价值观。我们还发现，在他们的监管重点和他们的权力感（即，晋升/高权力；预防/低权力）之间经历过契合的参与者受小组的影响较小。