当前位置: X-MOL 学术Asian J. Commun. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
How liberals and conservatives respond to feasibility and desirability appeals in anti-tobacco campaigns
Asian Journal of Communication ( IF 1.5 ) Pub Date : 2018-08-03 , DOI: 10.1080/01292986.2018.1504975
Younghwa Lee 1 , Sukki Yoon 2 , Seungwoo Chun 3 , Chanmo Park 4 , Kacy Kim 2
Affiliation  

ABSTRACT Using two experiments, this study aims to investigate how politically liberal or conservative message recipients respond to anti-tobacco appeals. The results show that in Study 1, respondents were exposed to a message about price policy. In Study 2, they were exposed to a message about a warning policy. In both studies, liberal participants more favorably evaluated anti-tobacco messages emphasizing feasibility rather than desirability, whereas conservative participants more positively evaluated messages emphasizing desirability rather than feasibility. Implications for policymakers and marketers are discussed.

中文翻译:

自由派和保守派如何回应反烟草运动中的可行性和合意性呼吁

摘要 本研究使用两个实验,旨在调查政治上自由或保守的消息接收者如何响应反烟草呼吁。结果表明,在研究 1 中,受访者会收到有关价格政策的信息。在研究 2 中,他们收到了有关警告政策的消息。在这两项研究中,自由派参与者更积极地评估强调可行性而非可取性的反烟草信息,而保守派参与者更积极地评估强调可取性而非可行性的信息。讨论了对政策制定者和营销人员的影响。
更新日期:2018-08-03
down
wechat
bug