Abstract A recent review article by Braem et al. (2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences) summarises some of the major challenges associated with investigating the dynamics of cognitive control in conflict tasks and recommends steps that researchers can take to minimise these challenges. This commentary highlights two further considerations for researchers studying the dynamics of cognitive control. First, researchers should consider analysing effects stemming from trial n - 2 to identify (a) how the congruency sequence effect emerges over a longer series of trials and (b) whether residual feature-integration effects remain in confound-minimised designs. Second, data from hand-tracking studies indicates that the dynamics observed in button-press measures of response time reflect the functioning of dissociable processes. Consequently, researchers should consider how the various manipulations used to investigate the dynamics of cognitive control might impact different processes underlying performance.

中文翻译：

---

在冲突任务中测量自适应控制时的其他注意事项

摘要 Braem 等人最近发表的一篇评论文章。(2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences) 总结了与调查冲突任务中认知控制动态相关的一些主要挑战，并建议研究人员可以采取哪些措施来最大限度地减少这些挑战。这篇评论强调了研究认知控制动态的研究人员的两个进一步考虑。首先，研究人员应该考虑分析来自试验 n - 2 的效应，以确定 (a) 一致性序列效应如何在更长的试验序列中出现，以及 (b) 残差特征整合效应是否仍然存在于混淆最小化设计中。其次，来自手部追踪研究的数据表明，在响应时间的按钮按下测量中观察到的动态反映了可分离过程的功能。最后，