This research aims to analyze and compare the selection of relevant papers by two bibliometric methods, namely, the Knowledge Development Process-Constructivist (Proknow-C) and the Methodi Ordinatio, which were also discussed in terms of common steps, limitations and underlying assumptions. Particularly, the topic of knowledge management in small and medium-sized enterprises was chosen in order to illustrate the application of these two methods that support systematic reviews. Besides descriptive indexes such as citations and journal impact, co-citation analysis was employed to examine selected papers. The results showed that both methods possess a high agreement rate in terms of selecting recent articles, but a low agreement rate regarding relevant/seminal articles, besides revealing a strong bias of the Methodi Ordinatio towards recent articles when the alpha constant is 10. Particularly, recent papers (up to two years of publication) represent about 80 % of top-50 InOrdinatio ranked articles. The co-citation analysis of the 46 selected articles (29 recent; 17 relevant) corroborated the methods capacity to select relevant articles. Finally, further bibliometric reviews in other topics may benefit from the common steps, limitations and underlying assumptions discussed in this research for selecting and analyzing relevant papers.

这项研究旨在通过两种文献计量方法，即知识开发过程建构主义者（Proknow-C）和Methodi准则，来分析和比较相关论文的选择，并从共同步骤，局限性和基本假设方面进行了讨论。特别地，选择中小企业知识管理的主题是为了说明这两种支持系统评价的方法的应用。除了诸如引文和期刊影响之类的描述性指标外，还采用共引分析法对选定的论文进行审查。结果表明，这两种方法在选择最近的文章方面具有较高的一致率，而在相关/主要文章方面的一致性较低，除了揭示alpha常数为10时Methodi Ordinatio对最新文章的强烈偏见外。特别是，最新论文（长达两年的出版时间）占InOrdinatio排名前50位文章的约80％。对46篇选定文章（最近29篇；相关17篇）的共引分析证实了选择相关文章的方法能力。最后，其他主题中的其他文献计量学评论可能会受益于本研究中用于选择和分析相关论文的通用步骤，局限性和基本假设。17个相关）证实了选择相关文章的方法能力。最后，其他主题中的其他文献计量学评论可能会受益于本研究中用于选择和分析相关论文的通用步骤，局限性和基本假设。17个相关）证实了选择相关文章的方法能力。最后，其他主题中的其他文献计量学评论可能会受益于本研究中用于选择和分析相关论文的通用步骤，局限性和基本假设。