Abstract

This paper is a continuation of our works [1, 2], in which we discussed some incorrect approaches to identifying large-scale types of solar wind and related incorrect conclusions drawn when analyzing the solar-terrestrial physics data. In this paper, we analyze the sets of CME-induced, CIR-induced, and multistep magnetic storms for the period of 1996–2004 from the list by Kataoka and Miyoshi [3]. It is shown that a significant number of the events in this list were identified incorrectly and that their interpretation differs, both from our catalog (Yermolaev et al. [4], ftp://ftp.iki.rssi.ru/pub/omni/) for the Sheath, ICME, and CIR and from the catalog by Richardson and Cane [5] for ICME. The use of the uncorrected list of Kataoka and Miyoshi leads to incorrect identification of the interplanetary drivers of magnetic storms and to erroneous conclusions, for example, in paper [6].

中文翻译：

---

识别大型太阳风的类型及其在磁层物理中的作用的一些问题：3.使用发布的不正确数据

摘要

本文是我们工作[1，2]的继续，其中我们讨论了一些识别大规模太阳风类型的不正确方法，以及在分析太阳地面物理数据时得出的相关不正确结论。在本文中，我们从Kataoka和Miyoshi [3]的列表中分析了1996年至2004年CME诱发，CIR诱发和多级磁暴的集合。结果表明，该列表中的大量事件均未正确识别，并且其解释也与我们的目录不同（Yermolaev等人[4]，ftp：//ftp.iki.rssi.ru/pub/omni /）表示护套，ICME和CIR，Richardson和Cane [5]的目录则表示ICME。