Bike sharing systems are increasingly promoted as a quick, accessible, affordable, and healthy transport alternative in a less car-dependent urban mobility system. The objective of this article is to elucidate the social and spatial inclusiveness of bike sharing, by exploring its intersectionality with user backgrounds and residential contexts, and its mechanisms of mediation by attitudes, mobility resources and daily mobility patterns. Hereto, the paper examines and cross-compares the discrepancies between stated bike sharing interest and reported bike sharing membership, amongst a sample of 3672 residents of urban regions in Norway in structural equation models (SEM). Our results indicate that interest is positively influenced by early adopter characteristics, such as young age, full-time work, environmental consciousness, urban outlook, urban residential locations, and the current adoption of combined bicycle and public transport use. In contrast, reported bike sharing membership is explained more typically as a travel behaviour: with reduced effects of attitudes; enhanced effects of residential urban form and bicycle-public transport use; and additional negative effects of car and bike ownership. The paper concludes by discussing these and other interest-adoption discrepancies across social and spatial categories, to derive policy and research directions for inclusive bike sharing.

越来越多地将自行车共享系统作为一种快速，便捷，负担得起且健康的交通替代方式，在对汽车的依赖性较小的城市交通系统中得到推广。本文的目的是通过探讨自行车与用户背景和居住环境的相互关系，以及通过态度，交通资源和日常交通方式进行调解的机制，来阐明自行车共享的社会和空间包容性。到目前为止，本文在结构方程模型（SEM）中对挪威城市地区3672名居民进行了抽样调查，研究并交叉比较了既定自行车共享兴趣和报告的自行车共享成员资格之间的差异。我们的结果表明，兴趣受到早期采用者特征的积极影响，例如年轻年龄，专职工作，环境意识，城市风貌，城市居民区，以及当前自行车和公共交通工具结合使用的方式。相反，报告的共享单车会员资格通常被解释为旅行行为：态度影响减小；增强居民城市形态和自行车公共交通的使用效果；以及汽车和自行车所有权的其他负面影响。本文通过讨论这些和其他在社会和空间类别中的兴趣采纳差异得出结论，从而得出包容性自行车共享的政策和研究方向。以及汽车和自行车所有权的其他负面影响。本文通过讨论这些和其他在社会和空间类别中的兴趣采纳差异得出结论，从而得出包容性自行车共享的政策和研究方向。以及汽车和自行车所有权的其他负面影响。本文通过讨论这些和其他在社会和空间类别上的兴趣采纳差异得出结论，以得出包容性自行车共享的政策和研究方向。