当前位置: X-MOL 学术Annu. Rev. Psychol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Moral Judgments.
Annual Review of Psychology ( IF 23.6 ) Pub Date : 2021-01-05 , DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-072220-104358
Bertram F Malle 1
Affiliation  

Research on morality has increased rapidly over the past 10 years. At the center of this research are moral judgments—evaluative judgments that a perceiver makes in response to a moral norm violation. But there is substantial diversity in what has been called moral judgment. This article offers a framework that distinguishes, theoretically and empirically, four classes of moral judgment: evaluations, norm judgments, moral wrongness judgments, and blame judgments. These judgments differ in their typical objects, the information they process, their speed, and their social functions. The framework presented here organizes the extensive literature and provides fresh perspectives on measurement, the nature of moral intuitions, the status of moral dumbfounding, and the prospects of dual-process models of moral judgment. It also identifies omitted questions and sets the stage for a broader theory of moral judgment, which the coming decades may bring forth.

中文翻译:


道德判断。

在过去的 10 年中,对道德的研究迅速增加。这项研究的核心是道德判断——感知者对违反道德规范的行为做出的评价性判断。但是所谓的道德判断存在很大差异。本文提供了一个框架,从理论上和经验上区分了四类道德判断:评价、规范判断、道德错误判断和责备判断。这些判断的不同之处在于它们的典型对象、它们处理的信息、它们的速度和它们的社会功能。这里提出的框架组织了大量文献,并为测量、道德直觉的本质、道德傻眼的现状以及道德判断双过程模型的前景提供了新的视角。

更新日期:2021-01-06
down
wechat
bug