当前位置: X-MOL 学术Journal of the Medical Library Association › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Evaluating nursing faculty's approach to information literacy instruction: a multi-institutional study.
Journal of the Medical Library Association ( IF 2.9 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-01 , DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2020.841
Bethany S McGowan 1 , Laureen P Cantwell 2 , Jamie L Conklin 3 , Rebecca Raszewski 4 , Julie Planchon Wolf 5 , Maribeth Slebodnik 6 , Sandra McCarthy 7 , Shannon Johnson 8
Affiliation  

Objective: In 2018, the Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL) Health Sciences Interest Group convened a working group to update the 2013 Information Literacy Competency Standards for Nursing to be a companion document to the 2016 Framework for Information Literacy in Higher Education. To create this companion document, the working group first needed to understand how nursing faculty approached information literacy (IL) instruction. Methods: The working group designed a survey that assessed how nursing faculty utilized IL principles in coursework and instruction. The survey consisted of nineteen mixed methods questions and was distributed to nursing faculty at eight institutions across the United States. Results: Most (79%) faculty indicated that they use a variety of methods to teach IL principles in their courses. While only 12% of faculty incorporated a version of the ACRL IL competencies in course design, they were much more likely to integrate nursing educational association standards. Faculty perceptions of the relevance of IL skills increased as the education level being taught increased. Conclusion: The integration of IL instruction into nursing education has mostly been achieved through using standards from nursing educational associations. Understanding these standards and understanding how faculty perceptions of the relevance of IL skills change with educational levels will guide the development of a companion document that librarians can use to collaborate with nurse educators to integrate IL instruction throughout nursing curriculums at course and program levels.

中文翻译:

评估护理学院的信息素养教学方法:一项多机构研究。

目标:2018 年,大学与研究图书馆协会 (ACRL) 健康科学兴趣小组召集了一个工作组,以更新 2013 年护理信息素养能力标准,作为 2016 年高等教育信息素养框架的配套文件。要创建此配套文件,工作组首先需要了解护理学院如何处理信息素养 (IL) 教学。方法:工作组设计了一项调查,评估护理学院如何在课程作业和教学中利用 IL 原则。该调查由 19 个混合方法问题组成,并分发给美国 8 个机构的护理学院。结果:大多数 (79%) 教师表示他们使用多种方法在课程中教授 IL 原则。虽然只有 12% 的教师在课程设计中加入了 ACRL IL 能力的一个版本,但他们更有可能整合护理教育协会的标准。随着所教教育水平的提高,教师对 IL 技能相关性的看法也随之增加。结论:IL 教学与护理教育的整合主要是通过使用护理教育协会的标准来实现的。了解这些标准并了解教师对 IL 技能相关性如何随教育水平变化的看法将指导图书馆员可以用来与护士教育者合作的配套文件的开发,以便将 IL 教学整合到课程和项目级别的整个护理课程中。他们更有可能整合护理教育协会的标准。随着所教教育水平的提高,教师对 IL 技能相关性的看法也随之增加。结论:IL 教学与护理教育的整合主要是通过使用护理教育协会的标准来实现的。了解这些标准并了解教师对 IL 技能相关性如何随教育水平变化的看法将指导图书馆员可以用来与护士教育者合作的配套文件的开发,以便将 IL 教学整合到课程和项目级别的整个护理课程中。他们更有可能整合护理教育协会的标准。随着所教教育水平的提高,教师对 IL 技能相关性的看法也随之增加。结论:IL 教学与护理教育的整合主要是通过使用护理教育协会的标准来实现的。了解这些标准并了解教师对 IL 技能相关性如何随教育水平变化的看法将指导图书馆员可以用来与护士教育者合作的配套文件的开发,以便将 IL 教学整合到课程和项目级别的整个护理课程中。随着所教教育水平的提高,教师对 IL 技能相关性的看法也随之增加。结论:IL 教学与护理教育的整合主要是通过使用护理教育协会的标准来实现的。了解这些标准并了解教师对 IL 技能相关性如何随教育水平变化的看法将指导图书馆员可以用来与护士教育者合作的配套文件的开发,以便将 IL 教学整合到课程和项目级别的整个护理课程中。随着所教教育水平的提高,教师对 IL 技能相关性的看法也随之增加。结论:IL 教学与护理教育的整合主要是通过使用护理教育协会的标准来实现的。了解这些标准并了解教师对 IL 技能相关性如何随教育水平变化的看法将指导图书馆员可以用来与护士教育者合作的配套文件的开发,以便将 IL 教学整合到课程和项目级别的整个护理课程中。
更新日期:2020-07-01
down
wechat
bug