ABSTRACT

Background

Social capital is often cited as shaping impacts of participatory arts, although the concept has not been systematically mapped in arts, health and wellbeing contexts. In wider health inequalities research, complex, differential, and sometimes negative impacts of social capital have been recognised.

Methods

This paper maps of social capital concepts in qualitative research as part of the UK What Works for Wellbeing evidence review programme on culture, sport and wellbeing.

Results

Studies often cite positive impacts of bonding and, to a lesser extent, bridging social capital. However, reported challenges suggest the need for a critical approach. Forms of linking social capital, such as reframing and political engagement to address social divisions, are less often cited but may be important in participatory arts and wellbeing.

Conclusions

Future research should further specify dimensions of social capital as well as their nuanced effects in arts, and wellbeing contexts.

中文翻译：

---

社会资本在参与性艺术促进福祉中的作用：定性系统评价的结果

摘要

背景

社会资本经常被认为可以塑造参与性艺术的影响，尽管这一概念尚未在艺术、健康和福祉背景下得到系统的映射。在更广泛的健康不平等研究中，社会资本的复杂、差异性、有时甚至是负面影响已被认识到。

方法

本文描绘了定性研究中的社会资本概念，作为英国关于文化、体育和福祉的“什么对福祉有效”证据审查计划的一部分。

结果

研究经常引用联系的积极影响，以及在较小程度上桥接社会资本的积极影响。然而，所报告的挑战表明需要采取关键方法。连接社会资本的形式，例如重构和政治参与来解决社会分歧，很少被提及，但在参与性艺术和福祉中可能很重要。

结论

未来的研究应进一步明确社会资本的维度及其对艺术和福祉环境的微妙影响。