ABSTRACT Applied lighting research is inherently interdisciplinary. Any one study in which investigators seek to understand the effects of light may involve expertise drawn from fields as varied as psychology, physiology, photobiology, vision science, engineering, physics, horticulture, and architecture. Despite differences in the specifics of research methods, data management, data analysis, and presentation, the logic of scientific thinking is a common thread. This is the basis on which the peer review system operates. This article leads readers through the criteria used by journal reviewers and editors to determine the acceptability of papers for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. This is done by review of the 1941 paper by Kruithof in which he described the now-famous “Kruithof curve” relating preferred light source color temperatures and illuminances: How would one review the original Kruithof paper today, and what would we expect to be told about this work in order to judge the validity of the conclusions?

中文翻译：

---

判断应用照明研究的科学质量

摘要 应用照明研究本质上是跨学科的。研究人员试图了解光的影响的任何一项研究都可能涉及来自心理学、生理学、光生物学、视觉科学、工程、物理学、园艺和建筑等各个领域的专业知识。尽管在研究方法、数据管理、数据分析和呈现的细节上存在差异，但科学思维的逻辑是一个共同点。这是同行评审系统运作的基础。本文引导读者了解期刊审稿人和编辑使用的标准，以确定论文在同行评审期刊上发表的可接受性。