当前位置: X-MOL 学术Scientometrics › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
Basic research intensity and diversified performance: the moderating role of government support intensity
Scientometrics ( IF 3.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-07-24 , DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03635-x
Qinghua Xia , Qinwei Cao , Manqing Tan

The relationship between basic research intensity and diversified performance is a very important problem that has not theoretically answered. Based on the panel data of universities directly under the ministry of education, considering the three missions of the university and the typical characteristics of basic research, we subdivide the diversified performance into innovation performance, economic performance, social performance and international cooperation performance. We find that enhancing the intensity of basic research can increase the number of patent applications and invention patent applications, but cannot increase the total number of paper publications and the number of English paper publications. Meanwhile, improving basic research intensity does not necessarily promote economic performance, while the promotion effect on social performance needs a lag period of 1 year. Furthermore, enhancing basic research intensity does not necessarily significantly improve international cooperation performance, and even has a significant negative impact after lagged 2 periods. Finally, government support intensity only plays a moderating role between basic research intensity and innovation performance, but not between basic research intensity and other types of performance. This reveals that the government plays a key role in the stage of knowledge production, but its role in the stage of knowledge transformation is relatively limited.

中文翻译:

基础研究强度与多元化绩效:政府支持强度的调节作用

基础研究强度与多元化绩效之间的关系是一个非常重要的问题,尚未在理论上得到解答。基于教育部直属高校面板数据,结合高校三大使命和基础研究的典型特点,将多元化绩效细分为创新绩效、经济绩效、社会绩效和国际合作绩效。我们发现加强基础研究的力度可以增加专利申请和发明专利申请的数量,但不能增加论文发表总数和英文论文发表的数量。同时,提高基础研究强度并不一定能促进经济绩效,而对社会绩效的促进作用则需要1年的滞后期。此外,加强基础研究强度并不一定能显着提高国际合作绩效,甚至在滞后2个时期后会产生显着的负面影响。最后,政府支持强度仅在基础研究强度与创新绩效之间起调节作用,而在基础研究强度与其他类型绩效之间没有调节作用。这说明政府在知识生产阶段发挥着关键作用,但在知识转化阶段的作用相对有限。甚至在滞后 2 个时期后产生显着的负面影响。最后,政府支持强度仅在基础研究强度与创新绩效之间起调节作用,而在基础研究强度与其他类型绩效之间没有调节作用。这说明政府在知识生产阶段发挥着关键作用,但在知识转化阶段的作用相对有限。甚至在滞后 2 个时期后产生显着的负面影响。最后,政府支持强度仅在基础研究强度与创新绩效之间起调节作用,而在基础研究强度与其他类型绩效之间没有调节作用。这说明政府在知识生产阶段发挥着关键作用,但在知识转化阶段的作用相对有限。
更新日期:2020-07-24
down
wechat
bug