Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted by the United Nations in 2015 as a framework comprising 231 indicators to assess the level of sustainable development in all countries. However, the framework is criticised for lacking an inclusive evaluation of resilience despite accepting it as a component of sustainability. Many resilience indicators have been proposed in the literature with the potential to be introduced in SDGs. Yet, the initial challenge is the lack of an agreement on resilience dimensions and a common framework of indicators to measure them. In this review, key resilience dimensions (KDs), as well as the related objective indicators, are defined through the review of the resilience literature, from 1970 to the present day. Here, 21 different resilience dimensions, along with the indicators to assess them, have been extracted. Conducting the framework analysis method, the indicators related to each dimension have been coded based on variables (that categorise indicators due to the measured features) and sub-domains (that classify variables in overall themes). Later, similarity matrices are developed to define the strength of the codes' co-occurrence among 21 dimensions. Consequently, five KDs were conceptualised - social, economic, institutional, infrastructural, and environmental. The KDs have been later utilised as a context on which indicators to measure resilience have been formulated in a comprehensive framework. This framework, as well as resolving the disagreement on resilience dimensions and their proliferation, supports the refinement of future indicators and enhancement of resilience measurement in SDGs.

联合国于2015年通过了可持续发展目标（SDG），该框架包括231个指标，用以评估所有国家的可持续发展水平。但是，该框架尽管被接受为可持续性的组成部分，却缺乏对弹性的全面评估，因此遭到批评。文献中已经提出了许多弹性指标，并有可能在可持续发展目标中引入。但是，最初的挑战是缺乏关于弹性维度的共识和衡量它们的通用指标框架。在这篇综述中，通过回顾1970年至今的抗逆性文献，定义了关键的抗逆性维度（KD）以及相关的客观指标。在这里，已经提取了21种不同的弹性维度以及评估它们的指标。进行框架分析方法时，已根据变量（根据度量特征对指标进行分类）和子域（对整体主题中的变量进行分类）对与每个维度相关的指标进行了编码。后来，开发了相似性矩阵来定义代码在21个维度之间共现的强度。因此，对五个KD进行了概念化-社会，经济，体制，基础设施和环境。后来将KD用作上下文，在此框架中已在一个综合框架中制定了衡量弹性的指标。该框架以及解决弹性方面及其在扩散方面的分歧，均支持完善未来指标并加强可持续发展目标中的弹性衡量。与每个维度相关的指标已根据变量（根据测量特征对指标进行分类）和子域（对整体主题中的变量进行分类）进行了编码。后来，开发了相似性矩阵来定义代码在21个维度之间共现的强度。因此，对五个KD进行了概念化-社会，经济，体制，基础设施和环境。后来将KD用作上下文，在此框架中已在一个综合框架中制定了衡量弹性的指标。该框架以及解决弹性方面及其在扩散方面的分歧，都支持完善未来指标并加强可持续发展目标中的弹性测量。与每个维度相关的指标已根据变量（根据测量特征对指标进行分类）和子域（对整体主题中的变量进行分类）进行了编码。后来，开发了相似性矩阵来定义代码在21个维度之间共现的强度。因此，对五个KD进行了概念化-社会，经济，体制，基础设施和环境。后来将KD用作上下文，在此框架中已在一个综合框架中制定了衡量弹性的指标。该框架以及解决弹性方面及其在扩散方面的分歧，均支持完善未来指标并加强可持续发展目标中的弹性衡量。