当前位置: X-MOL 学术Conserv. Lett. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
How far have we come? A review of MPA network performance indicators in reaching qualitative elements of Aichi Target 11
Conservation Letters ( IF 8.5 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-06 , DOI: 10.1111/conl.12746
Mairi C. Meehan 1, 2 , Natalie C. Ban 2 , Rodolphe Devillers 1, 3 , Gerald G. Singh 1 , Joachim Claudet 4
Affiliation  

Effective networks of marine protected areas (MPAs) are explicitly recognized and called for in international biodiversity conservation strategies such as the Aichi Targets. While various indicators have been proposed to assess effectiveness of individual MPAs, no comprehensive set of indicators exists for MPA networks, particularly for Aichi Target 11. The qualitative elements of this target recognize the value of social, economic, governance, and ecological factors in achieving effective biodiversity conservation. Here, we used a systematic literature review to identify indicators of MPA network effectiveness. We reviewed 64 publications, identifying 48 indicators that could be aligned with the qualitative elements. Results showed that assessments of MPA network effectiveness predominantly focused on effective management while neglecting equitable management and integration into the wider land and seascape. Indicators tended to focus on ecological characteristics, overlooking social, economic, and governance dimensions. Key challenges in addressing these gaps include identifying conflicting priorities and objectives in adjacent marine and land areas that interfere with cooperation and knowledge sharing, and ensuring diverse areas with distinct social and ecological contexts are considered. This study provides the first review of indicators for assessing MPA networks and adds to the literature assessing whether current and future targets can be met.

中文翻译:

我们走了多远?审查实现爱知指标11定性要素的MPA网络性能指标

在国际生物多样性保护战略(如爱知目标)中明确承认并要求建立有效的海洋保护区网络。尽管已提出了各种指标来评估单个MPA的有效性,但对于MPA网络,尤其是针对爱知指标11,尚没有一套全面的指标。该指标的定性要素认识到社会,经济,治理和生态因素在实现目标方面的价值。有效的生物多样性保护。在这里,我们使用系统的文献综述来确定MPA网络有效性的指标。我们审查了64个出版物,确定了48个可以与定性要素相符的指标。结果表明,对MPA网络有效性的评估主要集中在有效管理上,而忽略了公平管理和融入更广泛的陆地和海洋景观。指标往往集中在生态特征上,忽略了社会,经济和治理方面。解决这些差距的主要挑战包括:在相邻的海洋和陆地地区确定相互冲突的优先事项和目标,以干扰合作和知识共享;确保考虑具有不同社会和生态背景的不同地区。这项研究首次评估了评估MPA网络的指标,并增加了评估当前和未来目标是否可以实现的文献。指标往往集中在生态特征上,忽略了社会,经济和治理方面。解决这些差距的主要挑战包括:在相邻的海洋和陆地地区确定相互冲突的优先事项和目标,以干扰合作和知识共享;确保考虑具有不同社会和生态背景的不同地区。这项研究首次评估了评估MPA网络的指标,并增加了评估当前和未来目标是否可以实现的文献。指标往往集中在生态特征上,忽略了社会,经济和治理方面。解决这些差距的主要挑战包括:在相邻的海洋和陆地地区确定相互冲突的优先事项和目标,以干扰合作与知识共享;确保考虑具有不同社会和生态背景的不同地区。这项研究首次评估了评估MPA网络的指标,并增加了评估当前和未来目标是否可以实现的文献。并确保考虑具有不同社会和生态环境的不同地区。这项研究首次评估了评估MPA网络的指标,并增加了评估当前和未来目标是否可以实现的文献。并确保考虑具有不同社会和生态环境的不同地区。这项研究首次评估了评估MPA网络的指标,并增加了评估当前和未来目标是否可以实现的文献。
更新日期:2020-09-06
down
wechat
bug