当前位置: X-MOL 学术J. Appl. Physiol. › 论文详情
Our official English website, www.x-mol.net, welcomes your feedback! (Note: you will need to create a separate account there.)
The use of graded exercise test may be insufficient to quantify true changes in VO2max following exercise training in unfit individuals with metabolic syndrome.
Journal of Applied Physiology ( IF 3.3 ) Pub Date : 2020-09-03 , DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00455.2020
Alfonso Moreno-Cabañas 1 , Juan Fernando Ortega 1 , Felix Morales-Palomo 1 , Miguel Ramirez-Jimenez 1 , Laura Alvarez-Jimenez 1 , Jesus G Pallares 2 , Ricardo Mora-Rodriguez 1
Affiliation  

We studied the accuracy of graded exercise testing (GXT) to assess improvements in maximal oxygen uptake (VO2MAX) with exercise training in unfit individuals with metabolic syndrome (MetS). Forty-four adults with MetS (58±7 years; 36% women; BMI 31.8±4.8 kg·m-2) underwent 4 months of supervised high-intensity interval exercise training. VO2MAX was assessed using GXT followed by a constant-load verification test (VerT) at 110% of the maximal work-rate achieved during GXT. VO2 data from GXT and VerT were compared using repeated measures ANOVA. The mean improvement in VO2MAX following exercise training was similar when using GXT only or VerT. However, before training, 18 subjects achieved a higher VO2MAX during the verification test that was (+159 mLO2·min-1) higher than the GXT (P<0.001). After training, the underestimation of VO2MAX by GXT was reduced but still present (+64 mLO2·min-1). As a result, improvements in VO2MAX following exercise training as assessed using GXT only almost doubled the "real" increase in VO2MAX as measured by VerT in these 18 individuals. In the remaining 26 subjects, GXT scored below VerT only after training (+54 mLO2·min-1; P=0.046). As a consequence, GXT underestimated the actual VO2MAX increases (-49 mLO2·min-1; P=0.013) in these individuals. Assessment of changes in VO2MAX following exercise training using only GXT over-or-underestimates VO2MAX gains in unfit individuals with MetS. Thus, a verification test may be required to 1) identify the highest VO2MAX during a maximal exercise test on a cycle ergometer, 2) accurately quantify the true changes in cardiorespiratory fitness following exercise training in unfit individuals with MetS.

中文翻译:

在不适合患有代谢综合征的个体中进行运动训练后,使用分级运动测试可能不足以量化VO2max的真实变化。

我们研究了分级运动测试(GXT)的准确性,以评估患有代谢综合征(MetS)的不合适个体进行运动训练时最大摄氧量(VO 2MAX)的改善。四十四名成年人(58±7岁;女性36%; BMI 31.8±4.8 kg·m -2)接受了为期4个月的高强度间歇运动训练。使用GXT进行VO 2MAX评估,然后进行恒定负载验证测试(VerT),该测试为GXT期间达到的最大工作率的110%。使用重复测量方差分析比较来自GXT和VerT的VO 2数据。仅使用GXT或VerT时,运动训练后VO 2MAX的平均改善相似。但是,在训练之前,有18位受试者的VO较高验证测试期间的2MAX高于GXT(+159 mLO 2 ·min -1)(P <0.001)。训练后,GXT对VO 2MAX的低估有所降低,但仍然存在(+64 mLO 2 ·min -1)。结果,使用GXT评估运动训练后VO 2MAX的改善仅使这18个人的Ver 2测量的VO 2MAX “实际”增加几乎翻了一番。在其余26名受试者中,仅在训练后GXT得分低于VerT(+54 mLO 2 ·min -1; P = 0.046)。结果,GXT低估了实际VO 2MAX的增加(-49 mLO 2·min -1;P = 0.013)。仅使用GXT评估运动训练后VO 2MAX的变化即可高估或低估患有MetS的不适应个体的VO 2MAX增幅。因此,可能需要进行验证测试,以:1)在自行车测功机上进行的最大运动测试期间确定最高的VO 2MAX; 2)在不适合患有MetS的个体中进行运动训练后,准确地量化心肺健康的真实变化。
更新日期:2020-09-05
down
wechat
bug