Since the 2000s, increased aircraft noise annoyance has been observed in the populations living near airports. The DEBATS-study compared the exposure–response relationship estimated among airports’ residents in France with old and new EU standard curves. It also examines whether non-acoustical factors may explain this annoyance. For 1244 adults living near three French airports, information about demographic and socio-economic factors as well as aircraft noise annoyance, situational, personal and attitudinal factors was collected with a face-to-face questionnaire. Outdoor aircraft noise exposure was estimated by linking home address to noise exposure maps. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between annoyance and a broad range of other variables in addition to the L. Severe noise annoyance was associated not only with increased aircraft noise levels, but also with non-acoustical factors. Annoyance was higher than predicted by the old EU standard curve when estimated with the model including non-acoustical factors in addition to the L. It was even higher when only noise exposure was considered. However, annoyance was lower in DEBATS than predicted by the new EU standard curve provided by WHO. The increase of noise annoyance does not seem to be explained by the factors already mentioned in the literature as possible explanations. However, it cannot be ruled out that methodological differences in the HA assessment may be the reason for changes in annoyance over the years. For this reason, we argue for a definition of HA derived substantially as recommended by ICBEN. The findings of the DEBATS study also confirm that taking into account non-acoustical factors such as situational, personal and attitudinal factors would improve annoyance predictions.

中文翻译：

---

了解法国机场附近人口的空中交通噪音暴露与烦恼之间的关系

自 2000 年代以来，人们发现居住在机场附近的居民对飞机噪音的烦恼有所增加。 DEBATS 研究将法国机场居民估计的暴露-反应关系与新旧欧盟标准曲线进行了比较。它还研究了非声学因素是否可以解释这种烦恼。通过面对面的问卷调查，对居住在三个法国机场附近的 1244 名成年人收集了有关人口和社会经济因素以及飞机噪音烦恼、情境、个人和态度因素的信息。通过将家庭住址与噪声暴露地图相关联来估算室外飞机噪声暴露。除了 L 之外，还使用逻辑回归模型来研究烦恼与各种其他变量之间的关联。严重的噪音烦恼不仅与飞机噪音水平增加有关，还与非声学因素有关。当使用除 L 之外还包括非声学因素的模型进行估计时，烦扰度高于旧欧盟标准曲线的预测值。当仅考虑噪声暴露时，烦扰度甚至更高。然而，辩论中的烦恼程度低于世界卫生组织提供的新欧盟标准曲线的预测。噪音烦恼的增加似乎不能用文献中已经提到的可能解释的因素来解释。不过，不能排除医管局评估方法上的差异可能是多年来烦恼度变化的原因。出于这个原因，我们主张对 HA 的定义实质上按照 ICBEN 的建议派生。 DEBATS 研究的结果还证实，考虑情境、个人和态度等非声学因素将改善烦恼预测。