Gains in biodiversity from marine conservation might not correlate with a fair distribution of benefits, situation that has been narrowly documented. We analyzed how different social actors perceived changes in ecosystem services (ESs) and benefits from marine conservation and explored barriers preventing access to benefits, based on the Marine Protected Area of Multiple Uses (MUMPA) Almirantazgo Sound located in the Chilean Patagonia. We applied a semi-structured interview to artisanal fishers, tourism operators, State representatives and researchers (n = 86) and analyzed the data through frequency analysis and Covariance Analysis. Interviewees identified various ESs but prioritized food provision, maintenance of genetic diversity, and information for cognitive development, and among several benefits, they prioritized basic materials for a good life. Fishers were the most dependent on ESs and benefits, (i.e., food provision and employment/nutrition, respectively). Social actors’ general perception was that the MUMPA will not change wellbeing homogeneously, which can be explained by specific access barriers, such as reduced fishing entree. Most interviewees, despite personal attributes, recognized tour operators as the main ‘winners’ of the MUMPA creation and fishers as the main ‘losers’. For an inclusive governance, managers face the challenge of ‘reshaping’ the disparate images actors have on what the MUMPA is and does.

从海洋保护中获取的生物多样性收益可能与收益的公平分配没有关系，而有关情况已被狭窄地记录在案。我们基于多种用途的海洋保护区（MUMPA）Almirantazgo Sound，分析了不同的社会参与者如何看待生态系统服务（ESs）的变化以及海洋保护的收益，并探讨了阻碍获取收益的障碍。位于智利巴塔哥尼亚。我们对手工渔民，旅游经营者，国家代表和研究人员（n = 86）进行了半结构化访谈，并通过频率分析和协方差分析对数据进行了分析。受访者确定了各种ES，但将食物的提供，遗传多样性的维护和认知发展的信息列为优先事项，并且在多项好处中，他们将基本材料过上了美好生活的优先事项。渔民最依赖于环境，社会和福利（即分别是粮食供应和就业/营养）。社会参与者的普遍看法是，MUMPA不会均匀地改变人们的福祉，这可以通过特定的进入障碍来解释，例如减少捕鱼进入。大多数受访者，尽管有个人性格，公认的旅行社是MUMPA创作的主要“赢家”，而渔民则是主要的“失败者”。对于包容性治理，管理人员面临着“重塑”参与者对MUMPA是什么和做什么的不同形象的挑战。