As a rural development approach, concentrated rural settlement (CRS) was used for rural reconstruction when Wenchuan earthquake opened the opportunity window of quick and wide implementation. Although CRS has both proponents and critics, few studies have investigated the recovery success of villages reconstructed with CRS. This research gap has resulted in insufficient theoretical guidance for the practice of CRS and inefficient summarization and transfer of relevant experiences. This study therefore aims to measure the recovery success of three villages reconstructed with CRS located in the hardest-hit areas of the Wenchuan earthquake. Full-permutation polygon synthetic indicator method is adopted to evaluate the recovery success of the three case villages from the economic, social, environmental and disaster relief aspects. It is found that the three case villages have good overall recovery performances as economic, social, and environmental aspects improved a lot from 2008 to 2015, whereas the disaster relief recovery performance increased at the first several years but dramatically decreased at the later years. The implications inferred from the case studies are discussed in detail. This study provides a reference to local governments for monitoring CRS development and for improving recovery of villages reconstructed with CRS.

作为农村发展的一种方式，当汶川地震打开了快速而广泛实施的机会之窗时，集中农村定居点（CRS）被用于农村重建。尽管CRS既有支持者，也有批评家，但很少有研究调查使用CRS重建的村庄的恢复成功。这种研究差距导致对CRS的实践缺乏足够的理论指导，并且对相关经验的总结和传递效率不高。因此，本研究旨在评估位于汶川地震最严重地区的三个用CRS重建的村庄的恢复成功率。采用全置换多边形综合指标法从经济，社会，环境和救灾等方面对三个案例村的恢复成功进行了评估。结果发现，这三个案例村在2008年至2015年期间的经济，社会和环境方面都有很大改善，总体恢复表现良好，而救灾恢复表现在前几年有所提高，但在随后几年急剧下降。将从案例研究中推断出的含义进行了详细讨论。这项研究为地方政府监测CRS的发展和改善用CRS重建的村庄的恢复提供了参考。