The digitalization of education is a continuously developing process, aimed at the use of information and communication technologies. However, engineering education utilizes several forms of learning, with laboratory experiments being one of them. The use of digital learning materials (DLM) in labs is still limited due to numerous existing factors. This study investigates students' acceptance of using DLM during laboratory exercises in three universities located in Turkey, Poland, and Bulgaria. A questionnaire was prepared, and a survey was conducted among 625 learners. They were divided into eight categories, based on their engineering area and country. The survey results demonstrate that there is a strong correlation between the students' opinion on DLM and the use of DLM by their lab instructors, which means that their acceptance could be increased if more DLM are integrated in lab courses. The analysis of the questionnaire results also showed that there is a significant difference in the students' opinion on DLM, depending on the engineering area. Students of Food, Chemistry, and Electrical engineering rated the use of DLM quite high (above 4.0 out of 5), followed by the Civil engineering students with average results between 3.5 and 4.0. Respondents involved in Textile, Bio, and Machine engineering were the most skeptical (<3.5). Furthermore, their opinions covered a wide range from “Strongly disagree” to “Strongly agree.”

中文翻译：

---

学生对实验课使用数字学习材料接受度的多元文化调查

教育数字化是一个不断发展的过程，旨在利用信息和通信技术。然而，工程教育利用多种学习形式，实验室实验就是其中之一。由于存在众多因素，数字学习材料 (DLM) 在实验室中的使用仍然受到限制。本研究调查了位于土耳其、波兰和保加利亚的三所大学的学生对在实验室练习中使用 DLM 的接受程度。编制了一份问卷，对 625 名学习者进行了调查。他们根据工程领域和国家分为八类。调查结果表明，学生对 DLM 的看法与其实验室教师对 DLM 的使用之间存在很强的相关性，这意味着如果在实验室课程中集成更多的 DLM，他们的接受度可能会提高。对问卷结果的分析还表明，学生对 DLM 的看法存在显着差异，具体取决于工程领域。食品、化学和电气工程专业的学生对 DLM 的使用评价很高（超过 4.0 分，满分 5 分），其次是土木工程专业学生，平均成绩在 3.5 到 4.0 之间。纺织、生物和机械工程领域的受访者持怀疑态度最强烈 (<3.5)。此外，他们的意见涵盖了从“非常不同意”到“非常同意”的广泛范围。视工程领域而定。食品、化学和电气工程专业的学生对 DLM 的使用评价很高（超过 4.0 分，满分 5 分），其次是土木工程专业学生，平均成绩在 3.5 到 4.0 之间。纺织、生物和机械工程领域的受访者持怀疑态度最强烈 (<3.5)。此外，他们的意见涵盖了从“非常不同意”到“非常同意”的广泛范围。视工程领域而定。食品、化学和电气工程专业的学生对 DLM 的使用评价很高（超过 4.0 分，满分 5 分），其次是土木工程专业学生，平均成绩在 3.5 到 4.0 之间。纺织、生物和机械工程领域的受访者持怀疑态度最强烈 (<3.5)。此外，他们的意见涵盖了从“非常不同意”到“非常同意”的广泛范围。